Models for the electroneutral transport of Ca2+ by ionophores A23187, ionomycin, and 4-BrA23187 have been tested in a defined system comprised of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerophosphatidylcholine vesicles prepared by freeze-thaw extrusion. Quin-2-loaded and CaCl2-loaded vesicles were employed to allow the investigation of transport in both directions. Simultaneous or parallel measurements of H+ transport and membrane potential, respectively, indicate that for any of these ionophores, electrogenic transport events do not exceed 1 in 10,000 when there is no preexisting transmembrane potential. When a potential of approximately 150 mV is imposed across the membrane, transport catalyzed by A23187 remains electroneutral; however, for ionomycin and 4-BrA23187, approximately 10% of transport events may be electrogenic. The defined vesicle system has also been utilized to determine how the rate of Ca2+ transport varies as a function of ionophore and Ca2+ concentration and with the direction of transport. Some aspects of the results are unexpected and should be considered by investigators using ionophores in biological systems. These include the apparent failure of these compounds to fully equilibrate Ca2+ with a high affinity Ca2+ indicator when these species are separated by a membrane, rates of transport that vary markedly with the direction of transport, and extents of transport that are a function of ionophore concentration. At least some of these unexpected behaviors can be explained by a strong influence of delta pH on forward and reverse transport kinetics. In the case of A23187, the data also give some initial insights into the relationship between formation of the transporting species and the entry of this species into the membrane hydrophobic region.
The cation transport selectivities of the Ca2+ ionophores A23187, Ionomycin, and 4-BrA23187 have been determined using a model system comprised of phospholipid vesicles loaded with the chelator/indicator Quin-2. At pH 7.00 and a 100 microM concentration of the cations, A23187 displays the transport selectivity sequence Zn2+ > Mn2+ > Ca2+ > Co2+ > Ni2+ > Sr2+, with the absolute rates of transport spanning approximately 3 orders of magnitude. Similar data are obtained with Ionomycin, although the relative transport rates of Zn2+ and Mn2+ are equivalent, and the range of absolute rates is decreased by a factor of approximately 3. When values are normalized to those of Ca2+, transport selectivity is seen to be only weakly related to complexation or extraction selectivity. It is also seen that, when used to manipulate Ca2+ (or Mg2+), both ionophores can be expected to alter the distribution of additional divalent cations which have known biological activities. 4-BrA23187 is a low-activity ionophore for Ca2+, compared to A23187 and Ionomycin, while retaining comparable activities as an ionophore for the other cations. As a consequence, 4-BrA23187 is highly selective for the transport of Zn2+ and Mn2+, compared to Ca2+, with selectivity ratios approaching that of valinomycin for K+ over Na+ when conditions are optimal. Plots of the log of the rate of cation transport vs the log of the ionophore concentration indicate that Ca2+ is transported primarily as a 2:1 complex by A23187 and 4-BrA23187, but Zn2+ and Mn2+ are transported, in part, as 1:1 complexes. These findings, together with a postulated low stability of 2:1, compared to 1:1 complexes between 4-BrA23187 and divalent cations, partially explain the novel transport selectivity of this compound. Unlike A23187 or Ionomycin, 4-BrA23187 may be useful for investigating cell regulation by Zn2+ and Mn2+, without interference by regulatory mechanisms which respond to Ca2+.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.