While COVID-19 has primarily been characterized by the respiratory impact of viral pneumonia, it affects every organ system and carries a high consequent risk of death in critically ill patients. Higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores have been associated with increased mortality in patients critically ill patients with COVID-19. It is important that clinicians managing critically ill COVID-19 patients be aware of the multisystem impact of the disease so that care can be focused on the prevention of end-organ injuries to potentially improve clinical outcomes. We review the multisystem complications of COVID-19 and associated treatment strategies to improve the care of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

No abstract

The orthopedic surgery residency application process is highly competitive, and residency programs rely on objective measures, such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, to assist in applicant selection. To deemphasize standardized test scores and improve student well-being, governing bodies have elected to change the Step 1 examination to a pass/fail grading system beginning in 2022. Given the utility of Step 1 in the orthopedic surgery residency application process, this change will significantly affect how applicants are assessed. To determine how this change will affect the process, we developed and validated a 19-item anonymous electronic survey and invited program directors (PDs) from orthopedic surgery residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to respond. The 86 surveys that were completed represented a 43.2% response rate (86 of 199). Only 4.7% of orthopedic surgery PDs believe that this change is a good idea, and 91.7% of PDs believe that the change will make it more difficult to compare applicants objectively. In addition, 90.7% of PDs report that they will increase emphasis on the Step 2 CK (clinical knowledge) examination in comparing residency applicants for their program, with 90.4% of PDs reporting that they will require students to submit their Step 2 scores via the Electronic Residency Application Service. These results indicate that changing the Step 1 scoring to pass/fail is unpopular among orthopedic surgery PDs. Further, losing the numeric Step 1 score will increase reliance on Step 2 scores and emphasis on less objective measures, such as where an applicant attended medical school. [ Orthopedics . 2022;45(5):e257–e262.]

xcellent surgical care requires technical and cognitive competence, and individuals and teams who perform at the highest levels and model professionalism; these characteristics include respect for patients and colleagues, effective communication, teamwork, and self-regulation. 1 Surgeons with more unsolicited patient complaints, one measure of unprofessional behavior, have higher rates of postoperative complications, 2,3 malpractice, and risk management events. 4 When physicians act unprofessionally toward colleagues, team performance worsens, 5,6 and their practices are associated with both increased rates of malpractice claims 7 and greater patient dissatisfaction. 8,9 Patients whose surgeons have a greater number of reports about unprofessional behavior toward coworkers also are at greater risk for complications, which may threaten functional or aesthetic outcomes. 10 Background: Patient reports of unprofessional conduct by surgeons have been linked to postprocedure complications and increased risk for malpractice claims. Coworkers are also positioned to observe and report unprofessional behaviors, including concerns related to delivery of competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. This study compared rates of coworker concerns between plastic surgeons and other physicians (other surgical specialists and nonsurgeons), and characterized whether plastic surgery subspecialties differed in their rates of complaints. Methods: Coworker concern data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were retrieved from the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy's Coworker Observation Reporting System database. Specialty was classified as plastic surgery, non-plastic surgical, and nonsurgical. The plastic surgery cohort was further characterized by sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type (reconstructive only, aesthetic only, or hybrid), and postresidency training (ie, completion of a fellowship). Results:The study cohort included 34,170 physicians (302 plastic surgeons, 7593 non-plastic surgeons, and 26,275 nonsurgeons). A greater proportion of plastic surgeons (13.6%) had one or more coworker concerns compared with nonsurgeons (10.8%) and non-plastic surgeons (6.1%) (P < 0.001). The most prevalent concern category reported for plastic surgeons was clear and respectful communication. Among plastic surgeons who had no concerns versus those who had at least one concern, there was no significant difference when comparing sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type, or postresidency training. Conclusions: Plastic surgeons in this cohort study received more coworker reports than other surgeons and nonsurgical physicians. These data may be used by institutions to identify plastic surgeons at risk for preventable postprocedure complications and intervene with peer feedback intended to promote self-regulation.