Background In the age of COVID-19 and enforced social distancing, changes in patterns of trauma were observed but poorly understood. Our aim was to characterize traumatic injury mechanisms and acuities in 2020 and compare to years prior at our Level 1 trauma center. Materials and Methods Trauma patients triaged in 2016 through 2020 from January to May were reviewed. Patient demographics, level of activation (1 vs. 2), ISS, and mechanism of injury were collected. Data from 2016 through 2019 was combined, averaged by month, and compared to data from 2020 using Chi-squared analysis. Results During the months of interest, 992 trauma patients were triaged in 2020 and 4,311 in 2016-2019. The numbers of penetrating and Level 1 trauma activations in January – March of 2020 were similar to average numbers for the same months during 2016 through 2019. In April 2020, there was a significant increase in incidence of penetrating trauma compared to the prior four-year average (27% vs. 16%, p<0.002). Level 1 trauma activations in April 2020 also increased, rising from 17% in 2016 through 2019 to 32% in 2020 (p<0.003). These findings persisted through May of 2020 with similarly significant increases in penetrating and high-level trauma. Conclusion In the months after the initial spread of COVID-19, there was a perceptible shift in patterns of trauma. The significant increase in penetrating and high acuity trauma may implicate a change in population dynamics, demanding a need for thoughtful resource allocation at trauma centers nationwide in the context of a global pandemic.

Background Subtotal cholecystectomy is a “damage control” or “bailout procedure” that is used in difficult gallbladder cases when severe inflammation distorts the local anatomy resulting in increased risk in damage to surrounding structures. Subtotal cholecystectomy rates increased nationally over the past decade. We aimed to determine provider experience and patient factors associated with the performance of subtotal cholecystectomies. Methods All cholecystectomies from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed. Patient demographics, laboratory values, imaging, preoperative diagnosis, surgical technique (fenestrating vs. reconstituting), and years of attending and resident experience were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate for factors that increase the likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy. Results Of 916 cholecystectomies, 86 were subtotal. The likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy did not increase based on attending experience of ≤5 vs. > 5 years (odds ratio (OR) .66, P = .09). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.23, P = .03), male sex (aOR 2.59, P < .01), white blood cells (WBC) above 10.3 (aOR 2.02, P = .02), and preoperative diagnosis of acute on chronic cholecystitis (aOR 5.47, P < .01) were associated with increased likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy. Discussion Older age, male sex, WBC above 10.3, and preoperative diagnosis of acute on chronic cholecystitis were associated with the increased likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomies. The performance of subtotal cholecystectomy was not impacted by attending years of experience. In cases of severe gallbladder pathology, this technique is being used as an operative strategy among all surgeon levels.

Background/Aim: We evaluated timeliness of care at a safety-net hospital after implementation of a multidisciplinary breast program. Patients and Methods: A prospective database of patients with breast cancer was created after multidisciplinary breast program initiation in 2018. Patients were tracked to obtain time to completion of diagnostic imaging, biopsy, and treatment initiation. Patients with breast cancer diagnosed from 2015-2017 were reviewed for comparison. Results: A total of 102 patients were identified. There was no statistical difference in time to completion of imaging, biopsy, and initial treatment between the 2018 and the 2015-2017 cohorts (p>0.05). No statistical difference was observed in time to completion of imaging, biopsy, and initial treatment between different races (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within the same socioeconomic status, there was no differential delivery of screening, work-up, and treatment by race. Despite protocol implementations, efficiency of care remained limited in a safety-net hospital with lack of financial resources.