In this letter to the editor, we report 82 persons with CF (PwCF) self‐reported changes in mental and physical health and potential attribution with either the COVID‐19 pandemic and the initiation elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Emerging evidence has shown an association with ETI and mental health adverse events. The close proximity of ETI FDA approval and prescribing in PwCF and the COVID‐19 pandemic present a challenge in determining the cause of mental health decline. We report 33 (40%) of respondents felt that COVID‐19 contributed to a worsening of either their anxiety, depression, or both and 7 (9%) of respondents felt that ETI contributed to a worsening in their anxiety, depression, or both. Eighteen (23%) of respondents felt that ETI had contributed to improvement their mental health. This letter highlights multiple factors that could be impacting mental health beyond ETI. As the COVID‐19 pandemic is moving toward an endemic phase, future studies may have more success in deciphering ETI effects on mental health.

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are exposed to numerous drugs over their lifespan, and many of these drugs have Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for personalized dosing. The authors' aim was to ascertain the number of drugs with CPIC guidelines prescribed to SCD patients. Materials & methods: A search of Indiana University Health affiliated hospitals' electronic medical record identified 957 patients with a diagnosis of SCD. Drugs or drug classes with CPIC actionable guidelines ordered as inpatient and outpatient prescriptions were collected from SCD patients. Results: During the 16-year period, 892 (93%) patients received at least one drug that could have been dosed according to CPIC guidelines. Conclusion: Preemptive pharmacogenetics testing should be considered in SCD patients in order to utilize these data throughout the patient's life.

Background: Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are exposed to many drugs in their lifetime and many of these drugs have Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines that are available to guide dosing. Contemporary CF treatments are targeted to specific mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, and thus, require patients to have genetic testing before initiation of modulator therapy. However, aside from CFTR genetic testing, pharmacogenomic testing is not standard of care for CF patients.Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the number of non-CFTR modulator medications with CPIC guidelines that are prescribed to patients with CF. Materials & Methods:We identified all patients with a diagnosis of CF and queried our hospital electronic medical records (EMR) for all orders, including inpatient and prescriptions, for all drugs or drug classes that have CPIC actionable guidelines for drug-gene pairs that can be used to guide therapy. Results:We identified 576 patients with a diagnosis of CF that were treated at our institution during this 16-year period between June 2005 and May 2021. Of these patients, 504 patients (87.5%) received at least one drug that could have been dosed according to CPIC guidelines if pharmacogenomic results would have been available.Conclusions: Patients with CF have high utilization of drugs with CPIC guidelines, therefore preemptive pharmacogenomic testing should be considered in CF patients at the time of CFTR genetic testing.