. Cell death and the subsequent post-mortem changes, called necrosis, are integral parts of normal development and maturation cycle. Despite the importance of this process, the mechanisms underlying cell death are still poorly understood. In the recent literature, cell death is said to occur by two alternative, opposite modes: apoptosis, a programmed, managed form of cell death, and necrosis, an unordered and accidental form of cellular dying. The incorrect consequence is the overlapping of: a) the process whereby cells die, cell death; and b) the changes that the cells and tissues undergo after the cells die. Only the latter process can be referred to as necrosis and represents a 'no return' process in cell life. In this review, we discuss the excellent basic research developed in this field during last decades and problems that remain to be resolved in defining both experimentally and mechanicistically the events that lead to and characterize cell death. IntroductionCell death is part of normal development and maturation cycle, and is the component of many response patterns of living tissues to xenobiotic agents (i.e. micro organisms and chemicals) and to endogenous modulations, such as inflammation and disturbed blood supply (1,2). Cell death is an important variable in cancer development, cancer prevention and cancer therapy (3-5). In the treatment of cancer, the major approach is the removal, by surgery, of the neoplasm and/or the induction of cell death in neoplastic cells by radiation, toxic chemicals, antibodies and/or cells of the immune system (6-9). On the other hand, this pathobiological process remains poorly understood and the physiological and biochemical factors that lead to cell death are still not clear. One main factor is the existing confusion between 'apoptosis' process, as compared and contrasted with 'necrosis', leading to the overlapping of the ante mortem changes, i.e. the process of cell death, and the post-mortem changes, i.e. the necrosis process. The pathobiology of cell deathThe elegant scientific exploration of sub-cellular molecular anatomy of the last decades have reinforced the cell concept as 'the smallest integrating unit in biology: a pseudo-intelligent computer that receives, screens, changes, reacts to and adapts to a host of environmental signals, all of this activity apparently

No abstract

Polymeric microparticles (MPs) are recognized as very popular carriers to increase the bioavailability and bio-distribution of both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. Among different kinds of polymers, poly-(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) is one of the most accepted materials for this purpose, because of its biodegradability (due to the presence of ester linkages that are degraded by hydrolysis in aqueous environments) and safety (PLGA is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved compound). Moreover, its biodegradability depends on the number of glycolide units present in the structure, indeed, lower glycol content results in an increased degradation time and conversely a higher monomer unit number results in a decreased time. Due to this feature, it is possible to design and fabricate MPs with a programmable and time-controlled drug release. Many approaches and procedures can be used to prepare MPs. The chosen fabrication methodology influences size, stability, entrapment efficiency, and MPs release kinetics. For example, lipophilic drugs as chemotherapeutic agents (doxorubicin), anti-inflammatory non-steroidal (indomethacin), and nutraceuticals (curcumin) were successfully encapsulated in MPs prepared by single emulsion technique, while water-soluble compounds, such as aptamer, peptides and proteins, involved the use of double emulsion systems to provide a hydrophilic compartment and prevent molecular degradation. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview about the preparation and characterization of drug-loaded PLGA MPs obtained by single, double emulsion and microfluidic techniques, and their current applications in the pharmaceutical industry. Graphic abstract