In this paper, a pricing mechanism is proposed for the electricity supply chain, which is consisting of one generation company (GC), multiple consumers, and competing utility companies (UCs). The UC participates in electricity supply chain management by a revenue sharing contract (RSC). In the electricity supply chain, the electricity real-time balance has an important role in the stable operation of the power system. Therefore, we introduce the demand response into the electricity supply chain to match supply with demand under forecast errors. Hence, we formulate a noncooperative game to characterize the interactions among the multiple competing UCs, which set the retail prices to maximize their profits. Besides, the UCs select their preferred contractual terms offered by the GC to maximize its profits and coordinate the electricity supply chain simultaneously. The existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium (NE) are examined, and an iterative algorithm is developed to obtain the NE. Furthermore, we analyze the RSC that can coordinate the electricity supply chain and align the NE with the cooperative optimum under the RSC. Finally, numerical results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model and the influence of market demand disruptions on the profits of the UCs, GC, and supply chain.

This paper proposes an economic dispatch strategy for the electricity system with one generation company, multiple utility companies and multiple consumers, which participate in demand response to keep the electricity real-time balance. In the wholesale markets, multiple utility companies will commonly select a reliable agent to negotiate with the generation company on the wholesale price. It is challengeable to find a wholesale price to run the electricity market fairly and effectively. In this study, we use the multiple utility companies' profits to denote the utility function of the agent and formulate the interaction between the agent and the generation company as a bargaining problem, where the wholesale price was enforced in the bargaining outcome. Then, the Raiffa-Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution (RBS) was utilized to achieve the fair and optimal outcome. In the retail markets, the unfavorable disturbances exist in the power management and price when the consumers participate in the demand response to keep the electricity real-time balance, which motivates us to further consider the dynamic power management algorithm with the additive disturbances, and then obtain the optimal power consumption and optimal retail price. Based on the consumers' utility maximization, we establish a price regulation model with price feedback in the electricity retail markets, and then use the iterative algorithm to solve the optimal retail price and the consumer's optimal power consumption. Hence, the input-to-state stability condition with additive electricity measurement disturbance and price disturbance is given. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the economic dispatch strategy.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper presents a pricing strategy to purchase the demand-side regulation service. Comparing with the traditional automatic generation control (AGC), the demand-side regulation service has lower cost and faster ramp rate, and thus can reduce the cost of the utility company. However, the payments for the demand-side regulation can also increase the cost. Thus, the cost of the utility company should be minimised by making a tradeoff between the demand-side regulation and the AGC. In this study, we formulate a cost minimisation problem considering the two-side regulation services. In general, the cost minimisation problem is nonconvex, and we use the forward method and golden section algorithm to obtain the globally optimal price for the demand-side regulation service. Numerical results demonstrate that the efficiency of the proposed model and the demand-side regulation can reduce the cost to the utility company significantly.