Embolization of type II endoleaks is successful early in preventing aneurysm sac growth and rupture after EVAR. However, a significant number of patients require more than one procedure, and at 5 years, many patients who underwent embolization of a type II endoleak continued to experience sac growth. Patients with hyperlipidemia who undergo coil embolization are more likely to require a second embolization procedure, and patients who smoke have a higher likelihood of AAA sac expansion after embolization. Continued long-term surveillance is necessary in this cohort of patients.
in the study. Main outcomes were mortality, complications, reinterventions, and length of hospital stay.Results: Fifty-eight patients (mean age 71 years (range 49-87), 53 (91%) males) with a total of 80 aortic and/or iliac pseudo or true PAA were treated with an endovascular stentgraft. Devices that were used were tube grafts (n ϭ 8), bifurcated stentgrafts (n ϭ 32), aorto-uni-iliac stentgrafts (n ϭ 7), and iliac extension grafts (n ϭ 11). Technical success rate was 95%. Median hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-122). The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4% (n ϭ 2). Mean follow-up was 41 months (range 0-106). Procedure related and cumulative mortality rate was 10% (n ϭ 6) and 19% (n ϭ 11), respectively. CTA revealed 9 endoleaks (3 type I and 6 type II) in 8 patients and endotension in 2 patients. Type I endoleaks were observed in 25% of patients treated with endovascular tube grafts. The overall reintervention rate was 19% (n ϭ 11) with an annual risk of 4.7%. In non-tube graft patients the annual risk was 4.0%.Conclusions: The present study shows that endovascular repair with bifurcated or aorto-uni-iliac stentgrafts of paraanastomotic aortic and iliac aneurysms after initial prosthetic aortic surgery is a durable alternative to open reconstruction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.