Using an electrophoresis assay system developed in our laboratory, we have simultaneously measured single- and double-strand DNA breaks (SSBs and DSBs) induced by gamma radiation in small SV40 viral DNA molecules, under conditions of greatly varying radical scavenger concentration and DNA configuration. In our experiments with aqueous solutions of SV40 DNA, we observe that SSB induction is linear with dose (one-hit response), over the entire hydroxyl scavenger efficiency range examined, from approximately 0 to 5 x 10(9) s-1, while DSB induction shifts from having a major quadratic component (two-hit response) at very low scavenger efficiencies to nearly pure linear for efficiencies greater than 10(7) s-1. The mean ratio of SSBs to one-hit DSBs remains relatively constant with increasing scavenger efficiency, decreasing from about 100:1 to 40:1 as the scavenger efficiency increases from 2 x 10(5) s-1 to 5 x 10(9) s-1, and the absolute induction efficiencies for breaks decrease by three orders of magnitude. This decrease takes place primarily at scavenger efficiencies above 1 x 10(8) s-1. Irradiation of intranuclear SV40 minichromosomes induces SSBs and DSBs at nearly the same efficiencies as does irradiation of free DNA at the highest scavenger concentrations examined, and at only about twice the efficiencies observed at -75 degrees C, where direct effects are believed to predominate. Our observations that the linear-quadratic mix of the dose-response curve for DSBs depends critically on scavenger efficiency may help to clarify the considerable confusion in the literature on the shape of such curves. Our observations of a relatively constant ratio between one-hit SSBs and DSBs at low and moderate scavenger efficiencies are in agreement with the recent hypothesis of Siddiqi and Bothe (Radiat. Res. 112, 449-463 (1987)) that, contrary to widely and long-held beliefs, the formation by indirect effects of a one-hit DSB in DNA occurs under these conditions predominantly by a mechanism involving a single OH radical, with a presumed radical transfer between complementary DNA strands. In contrast, our results for strongly protective conditions are not consistent with this hypothesis, but are consistent with the predictions of Ward's hypothesis (Radiat. Res. 86, 185-195, (1981)) that one-hit DSBs from indirect effects are produced predominantly by local clusters of OH radicals from single energy deposition events (locally multiply damaged sites) rather than by single OH radicals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Shear distortion of amyloid-beta (Aβ) solutions accelerates amyloid cascade reactions that may yield different toxic oligomers than those formed in quiescent solutions. Recent experiments indicate that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) containing Aβ flow through narrow brain perivascular pathways and brain parenchyma. This paper suggests that such flow causes shear distortion of Aβ molecules involving conformation changes that may be one of the initiating events in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Aβ shearing can occur in or around brain arteries and arterioles and is suggested as the origin of cerebral amyloid angiopathy deposits in cerebrovascular walls. Comparatively low flow rates of ISF within the narrow extracellular spaces (ECS) of the brain parenchyma are suggested as a possible initiating factor in both the formation of neurotoxic Aβ42 oligomers and amyloid fibrils. Aβ42 in slow-flowing ISF can gain significant shear energy at or near the walls of tortuous brain ECS flow paths, promoting the formation of a shear-distorted, excited state hydrophobic Aβ42* conformation. This Aβ42* molecule could possibly be involved in one of two paths, one involving rapid adsorption to a brain membrane surface, ultimately forming neurotoxic oligomers on membranes, and the other ultimately forming plaque within the ECS flow pathways. Rising Aβ concentrations combined with shear at or near critical brain membranes are proposed as contributing factors to Alzheimer’s disease neurotoxicity. These hypotheses may be applicable in other neurodegenerative diseases, including tauopathies and alpha-synucleinopathies, in which shear-distorted proteins also may form in the brain ECS.
If cerebrospinal and interstitial fluids move through very narrow brain flow channels, these restrictive surroundings generate varying levels of fluid shear and different shear rates, and dissolved amyloid monomers absorb different shear energies. It is proposed that dissolved amyloid-β protein (Aβ) and other amyloid monomers undergo shear-induced conformational changes that ultimately lead to amyloid monomer aggregation even at very low brain flow and shear rates. Soluble Aβ oligomers taken from diseased brains initiate in vivo amyloid formation in non-diseased brains. The brain environment is apparently responsible for this result. A mechanism involving extensional shear is proposed for the formation of a seed Aβ monomer molecule that ultimately promotes templated conformational change of other Aβ molecules. Under non-quiescent, non-equilibrium conditions, gentle extensional shear within the brain parenchyma, and perhaps even during laboratory preparation of Aβ samples, may be sufficient to cause subtle conformational changes in these monomers. These result from brain processes that significantly lower the high activation energy predicted for the quiescent Aβ dimerization process. It is further suggested that changes in brain location and changes brought about by aging expose Aβ molecules to different shear rates, total shear, and types of shear, resulting in different conformational changes in these molecules. The consequences of such changes caused by variable shear energy are proposed to underlie formation of amyloid strains causing different amyloid diseases. Amyloid researchers are urged to undertake studies with amyloids, anti-amyloid drugs, and antibodies while all of these are under shear conditions similar to those in the brain.
Liquid sheared amyloid-β (Aβ) initiates amyloid cascade reactions, producing unstable, potentially toxic oligomers. There is a need for new analytical tools with which to study these oligomers. A very small bore capillary flow system is proposed as a tool for studying the effects of liquid shear in amyloid research. This simple system consists of injecting a short cylindrical liquid sample plug containing dissolved amyloid into a liquid mobile phase flowing through an empty, very small internal diameter capillary tube. For liquid samples containing a single protein sample, under conditions in which there is laminar flow and limited sample protein molecular diffusion, chromatograms monitoring the optical protein absorbance of capillary effluent contain either one or two peaks, depending on the mobile phase flow rate. By controlling the sample diffusion times through changes in flow rate and/or capillary diameter, this tool can be used to generate aliquot samples with precise, reproducible amounts of shear for exploring the effects of variable shear on amyloid systems. The tool can be used for producing in-capillary stopped flow spectra of shear-stressed Aβ monomers as well as for kinetic studies of Aβ dimer- and oligomer-forming reactions between shear stressed Aβ monomers. Many other experiments are suggested using this experimental tool for studying the effects of shear on different Aβ and other amyloid systems, including testing for potentially serious amyloid sampling errors in spinal tap quantitative analysis. The technique has potential as both a laboratory research and a clinical tool.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.