ObjectivesThe effectiveness of evaluation of the severity of epidermal growth-factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-associated dermatological toxicities remains a topic of debate. This study was designed to assess the correlation between quality of life (QoL) and severity of dermatological toxicity, evaluated using the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) and our novel scale, the Eruption Scoring System (ESS), in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab.MethodsCutaneous toxicity was evaluated, by oncologists and dermatologists, in patients (n=30) with histologically confirmed metastatic CRC who were scheduled to begin first-line chemotherapy combined with the EGFRI, cetuximab, using the NCI-CTCAE and ESS tools. Health-related QoL (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Skindex-29 and Skindex-17 dermatology-specific instruments. Correlations between QoL and skin toxicity severity were assessed using Spearman’s rank tests. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess interoperator agreement for ESS and NCI-CTCAE v4.0 scoring.ResultsA positive correlation was identified between dermatology HRQoL and the severity of dermatological toxicities assessed using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0 scale for cutaneous papulopustular acneiform rash; however, a stronger correlation was observed between HRQoL and toxicities evaluated using the ESS tool. Both NCI-CTCAE v4.0 and ESS tools demonstrated good interobserver agreement for grading of skin toxicity.ConclusionThere is a strong correlation between the scores generated by the ESS and NCI-CTCAE tools to grade cutaneous toxicity related to treatment with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, cetuximab. ESS can be considered a valid instrument for identification and grading of the severity of skin toxicity induced by cetuximab, with some advantages over the standard NCI-CTCAE scoring system.
ABSTRACT:The pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) were investigated in 17 women undergoing intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. HIPEC was performed immediately after completing debulking surgery, which included a number of peritonectomy procedures. PLD was injected and allowed to equilibrate in peritoneal cavity filled with 4 liters of physiological solution and stabilized at 42°C; next, the outflow line was opened and perfusion proceeded for 1 h. PLD was stable in peritoneal perfusate and plasma. During HIPEC, PLD peritoneal perfusate/plasma gradients averaged ϳ600 or >1000 for peak concentration or area under the curve. After HIPEC, PLD plasma levels remained stable or decreased. Biopsy samples of residual normal peritoneum or ovarian carcinomatosis were collected at the end of HIPEC and were shown to contain free doxorubicin. Correlating PLD decrements in peritoneal perfusate with plasma exposure to PLD or peritoneal deposition of free doxorubicin showed that the former occurred during preperfusional equilibration of PLD in peritoneal cavity, whereas the latter occurred during 1 h of perfusion. Plasma exposure to PLD correlated negatively with the number of peritonectomy procedures performed during surgery, whereas peritoneal deposition of free doxorubicin correlated positively. Taken together, these results show that PLD administered by intraoperative HIPEC undergoes limited systemic diffusion and releases active free doxorubicin in peritoneum exposed to ovarian carcinomatosis. PLD pharmacokinetics seem to be influenced by peritonectomy procedures.
Table of contentsMELANOMA BRIDGE 2015KEYNOTE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONSMolecular and immuno-advancesK1 Immunologic and metabolic consequences of PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation in melanomaVashisht G. Y. Nanda, Weiyi Peng, Patrick Hwu, Michael A. DaviesK2 Non-mutational adaptive changes in melanoma cells exposed to BRAF and MEK inhibitors help the establishment of drug resistanceGennaro Ciliberto, Luigi Fattore, Debora Malpicci, Luigi Aurisicchio, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Carlo M. Croce, Rita ManciniK3 Tumor-intrinsic beta-catenin signaling mediates tumor-immune avoidanceStefani Spranger, Thomas F. GajewskiK4 Intracellular tumor antigens as a source of targets of antibody-based immunotherapy of melanomaYangyang Wang, Soldano FerroneCombination therapiesK5 Harnessing radiotherapy to improve responses to immunotherapy in cancerClaire Vanpouille-Box, Erik Wennerberg, Karsten A. Pilones, Silvia C. Formenti, Sandra DemariaK6 Creating a T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to checkpoint blockadeHaidong Tang, Yang Wang, Yang-Xin FuK7 Biomarkers for treatment decisions?Reinhard DummerK8 Combining oncolytic therapies in the era of checkpoint inhibitorsIgor PuzanovK9 Immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma: should we combine or sequence ipilimumab and PD-1 antibody therapy?Michael A. PostowNews in immunotherapyK10 An update on adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for melanomAhmad TarhiniK11 Targeting multiple inhibitory receptors in melanomaJoe-Marc Chauvin, Ornella Pagliano, Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Hong Wang, Cindy Sanders, John M. Kirkwood, Tseng-hui Timothy Chen, Mark Maurer, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. ZarourK12 Improving adoptive immune therapy using genetically engineered T cellsDavid F. StroncekTumor microenvironment and biomarkersK13 Myeloid cells and tumor exosomes: a crosstalk for assessing immunosuppression?Veronica Huber, Licia RivoltiniK14 Update on the SITC biomarker taskforce: progress and challengesMagdalena ThurinWorld-wide immunoscore task force: an updateK15 The immunoscore in colorectal cancer highlights the importance of digital scoring systems in surgical pathologyTilman Rau, Alessandro LugliK16 The immunoscore: toward an integrated immunomonitoring from the diagnosis to the follow up of cancer’s patientsFranck PagèsEconomic sustainability of melanoma treatments: regulatory, health technology assessment and market access issuesK17 Nivolumab, the regulatory experience in immunotherapyJorge Camarero, Arantxa SanchoK18 Evidence to optimize access for immunotherapiesClaudio JommiORAL PRESENTATIONSMolecular and immuno-advancesO1 Ipilimumab treatment results in CD4 T cell activation that is concomitant with a reduction in Tregs and MDSCsYago Pico de Coaña, Maria Wolodarski, Yuya Yoshimoto, Giusy Gentilcore, Isabel Poschke, Giuseppe V. Masucci, Johan Hansson, Rolf KiesslingO2 Evaluation of prognostic and therapeutic potential of COX-2 and PD-L1 in primary and metastatic melanomaGiosuè Scognamiglio, Francesco Sabbatino, Federica Zito Marino, Anna Maria Anniciello, Monica Cantile, Margherita Cerrone,...
Purpose This phase II study, evaluated the activity and cardiotoxicity of first-line epirubicin plus low-dose trastuzumab (LD-T) in patients with HER2 positive MBC. Methods Patients received epirubicin 90 mg/sqm every 3 weeks plus weekly LD-T (2 mg/kg loading dose, then 1 mg/kg). After 6/8 cycles of epirubicin, single agent trastuzumab was continued. Cardiotoxicity was defined as signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), or ≥15% decline in LVEF without symptoms, or <15% LVEF decline to less than 50%, without symptoms. Results Forty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty-three received prior adjuvant anthracyclines. Overall response rate was 61.4%. The median time to progression was 7.4 months and the median survival was 32.8 months. Two (4.5%) patients developed CHF. Conclusions Epirubicin plus LD-T is an active regimen, however, the relatively high rate of cardiotoxicity together with the availability of less cardiotoxic and active trastuzumab-containing combinations precludes further evaluation of this regimen. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
The sequential combination of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, IIIA breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.