The high species richness of tropical forests has long been recognized, yet there remains substantial uncertainty regarding the actual number of tropical tree species. Using a pantropical tree inventory database from closed canopy forests, consisting of 657,630 trees belonging to 11,371 species, we use a fitted value of Fisher's alpha and an approximate pantropical stem total to estimate the minimum number of tropical forest tree species to fall between ∼ 40,000 and ∼ 53,000, i.e., at the high end of previous estimates. Contrary to common assumption, the Indo-Pacific region was found to be as species-rich as the Neotropics, with both regions having a minimum of ∼ 19,000-25,000 tree species. Continental Africa is relatively depauperate with a minimum of ∼ 4,500-6,000 tree species. Very few species are shared among the African, American, and the Indo-Pacific regions. We provide a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.
SignificanceIdentifying and explaining regional differences in tropical forest dynamics, structure, diversity, and composition are critical for anticipating region-specific responses to global environmental change. Floristic classifications are of fundamental importance for these efforts. Here we provide a global tropical forest classification that is explicitly based on community evolutionary similarity, resulting in identification of five major tropical forest regions and their relationships: (i) Indo-Pacific, (ii) Subtropical, (iii) African, (iv) American, and (v) Dry forests. African and American forests are grouped, reflecting their former western Gondwanan connection, while Indo-Pacific forests range from eastern Africa and Madagascar to Australia and the Pacific. The connection between northern-hemisphere Asian and American forests is confirmed, while Dry forests are identified as a single tropical biome.
Plant species diversity is surveyed in the southern part of the Taı¨National Park (TNP), Coˆte d'Ivoire. This park is the largest remaining tract of pristine forest in the West African rainforest biodiversity hotspot. Plant assemblages and environment factors were surveyed in 39 temporary 625-m 2 plots within three areas. The species list was completed thanks to itinerant prospections. TWINSPAN classification and detrended correspondence analysis were applied to the 39 releve´s. We recorded a total of 916 plant species, including 169 West African endemics, that rises the floristic richness of TNP in 1233 species. Most plant species recorded were GuineoCongolian species (90.9%) among which 8% were 'Sassandrian species', i.e. endemics of the extreme southwest Coˆte d'Ivoire. Eight of these endemics were exclusive of the southern part of TNP. The forest is very species-rich, particularly in Rubiaceae, Leguminosae and Euphorbiaceae. Most of the sampled species (59.5%) were erect phanerophytes with a dbh £ 10 cm. We distinguished 7 plant community types, mainly determined by geomorphology and disturbance history. Lowland forests were typical dense evergreen forests with different degrees of maturity related to historical human impact. Inselbergs and swampy depressions provide an original azonal vegetation. We conclude that the southern part of TNP contributes significantly to the regional biodiversity hotspot since it includes the last remnants of primary evergreen rainforest and contains species assemblages from both higher rainfall biomes on moist soils derived from schist parent material and lower rainfall biomes on inselberg slopes and top. As anthropogenic disturbance clearly reduces biodiversity, these last remnants should be integrally protected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.