Stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. As the number of stroke cases is rising from one year to another, policymakers require data on the amount spent on stroke to enforce better financing policies for prevention, hospital care, outpatient rehabilitation services and social services. We aimed to systematically assess the economic burden of stroke at global level. Cost of stroke studies were retrieved from five databases. We retrieved the average cost per patient, where specified, or estimated it using a top-down approach. Resulting costs were grouped in two main categories: per patient per year and per patient lifetime. We extracted information from forty-six cost of illness studies. Per patient per year costs are larger in high income countries and in studies conducted from the payer perspective. The highest average per patient per year cost by country was reported in the United States ($59,900), followed by Sweden ($52,725) and Spain ($41,950). The highest per patient lifetime costs were reported in Australia ($232,100) for all identified definitions of stroke. Existing literature regarding the economic burden of stroke is concentrated in high-income settings, with very few studies conducted in South America and Africa. Published manuscripts on this topic highlight substantial methodological heterogeneity, rendering comparisons difficult or impossible, even within the same country or among studies with similar costing perspectives.

The cost-effectiveness of Cerebrolysin as an add-on therapy for moderate–severe acute ischemic stroke is a topic that remains understudied. This study aims to address this gap by performing a comprehensive cost-utility analysis using both deterministic and probabilistic methods from a payer perspective and within the Romanian inpatient care setting. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using partial individual patient data from the 2016 Cerebrolysin and Recovery After Stroke (CARS) trial, utilizing three different health state valuation models. Cost data was extracted from actual acute care costs reported by Romanian public hospitals for reimbursement purposes for patients included in the CARS study. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for each treatment arm for the duration of the clinical trial. Deterministic analysis based on sample mean values indicates Cerebrolysin would be cost-effective at a threshold between roughly 18.8 and 29.9 thousand EUR, depending on valuation techniques. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results indicate an 80% chance probability of cost-effectiveness of Cerebrolysin as an add-on therapy for acute ischemic stroke, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of 50,000 EUR in a 90-day timeframe after stroke. Further economic evaluations of Cerebrolysin are needed to strengthen these findings, covering a timeframe of at least 12 months after the acute incident, which would account for treatment effects spanning beyond the first 90 days after ischemic stroke. These should be conducted to determine its cost-effectiveness under various care settings and patient pathways. Most importantly, modelling techniques are needed to answer important questions such as the estimates of population gain in QALYs after acute administration of Cerebrolysin and the potential offsetting of direct medical costs as a result of administering the intervention.

Low wages of health professionals are widely recognized as one of the drivers of informal payments in Romania’s healthcare system. In January 2018, the government increased wages by an average of 70% to 172% in the public healthcare sector. This study examined the trends in patient-reported informal healthcare payments, discussing the effect of a one-time wage increase in 2018 and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. It draws on monthly survey data of patient-reported informal payments collected between January 2017 and December 2021. We analyzed three periods: before the wage rise (“low pay”), between the wage rise and the COVID-19 pandemic (“high pay”), and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that patient-reported informal payments decreased between the “low pay” and “high pay” period but with a sharper decline during the COVID-19 pandemic. The share of respondents willing to report informal payments increased during the “high pay” period, indicating a stronger willingness to voice dissatisfaction with health services and informal payments, but slowed down during the first lockdown in 2020. Informal payments were more frequently reported in larger hospitals and the poorest geographical areas. While the 2018 wage increase may have contributed to less prevalent informal payments, survey coverage and design must be improved to draw robust, system-level conclusions to inform tailored policy actions.

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem affecting millions worldwide. Despite significant advances in medical care, there are limited effective interventions for improving cognitive and functional outcomes in TBI patients.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial investigated the safety and efficacy of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Cerebrolysin in improving cognitive and functional outcomes in TBI patients. Ninety-three patients with TBI were randomized to receive either Cerebrolysin and rTMS (CRB + rTMS), Cerebrolysin and sham stimulation (CRB + SHM), or placebo and sham stimulation (PLC + SHM). The primary outcome measures were the composite cognitive outcome scores at 3 and 6 months after TBI. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.ResultsThe study results demonstrated that the combined intervention of rTMS and Cerebrolysin was safe and well-tolerated by patients with TBI. Although no statistically significant differences were observed in the primary outcome measures, the descriptive trends in the study support existing literature on the efficacy and safety of rTMS and Cerebrolysin.DiscussionThe findings of this study suggest that rTMS and Cerebrolysin may be effective interventions for improving cognitive and functional outcomes in TBI patients. However, limitations of the study, such as the small sample size and exclusion of specific patient populations, should be considered when interpreting the results. This study provides preliminary evidence for the safety and potential efficacy of combining rTMS and Cerebrolysin in improving cognitive and functional outcomes in TBI patients. The study highlights the importance of multidisciplinary approaches in TBI rehabilitation and the potential for combining neuropsychological measurements and interventions to optimize patient outcomes.ConclusionFurther research is needed to establish these findings’ generalizability and identify the optimal dosages and treatment protocols for rTMS and Cerebrolysin.

No abstract