We demonstrate a genetic correlation between rearrangements of the second chromosome of D. buzzatii and thorax length, as a measure of body size. The results indicate that 2j and 2jz3 arrangements are correlated with large size, whereas 2st arrangement is correlated with small size. Some inversions (2st and 2jz3) show dominant effects and others (2j/f3) exhibit overdominance. These results show that at least 25 per cent of body size variation may be accounted for by the studied karyotypes. The possible integration of the genotypic, phenotypic and fitness levels, and also the possible implications to life-history evolution theories, are discussed. These results suggest that, under moderate to high heritability values, some kinds of chromosomal endocyclic and/or balancing selection may be valuable mechanisms for maintenance of body size variation.
Size-related phenotypic variation among second-chromosome karyotypes in Drosophila buzzatii was examined in an Argentinian natural population. For all measured traits (thorax and wing length; wing, head and face width), this inversion polymorphism exhibited a significant and (additive) linear contribution to the phenotypic variance in newly emerged wild flies. The results suggest that only overall body size, and not body shape, is affected, as no karyotypic variation was found for any trait when the effects of differences in within-karyotype size were removed with Burnaby's method. Likewise, in an experiment of longevity selection in the wild, variation in chromosomal frequencies was verified in the direction predicted on the basis of: (i) previous studies on longevity selection for body size in the wild and (ii) the pattern of chromosomal effects we observed on size. The direction of such selection is consistent with a pattern of antagonistic selection detected in previous studies on the inversion polymorphism.
Inversion polymorphisms in the second and fourth chromosomes of the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatti in the native distribution range of the species are described. Over 5,000 flies from 26 localities were scored revealing interesting geographic structuring of arrangement frequencies. Multiple regression and partial correlation approaches showed that the frequencies of second and fourth chromosome arrangements vary clinically along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients and to a lesser extent with longitude. Although many non selective explanations can account for this pattern, its resemblance to the clinal pattern described in recently established Australian populations of Drosophila buzzatii, strongly suggests a selective explanation. Additionally, the correlated variation observed between the frequencies of arrangements 2St on the second chromosome and 4St on the fourth suggests a pattern of interchromosomal association, which, when considering the vast area surveyed, might be explained as the result of epistatic interactions. The analysis of population structure revealed a significant regional pattern, concordant with previously described phytogeographic regions. F-statistics showed that the patterns of variation were different not only between the second and fourth chromosomes, but also between second chromosome arrangements, suggesting that selective differentiation might have contributed to population structure.Since D. buzzatii breeds and feeds on the decaying tissues of diverse cactus species present in different phytogeographic regions, and given that latitude and altitude are strong determinants of phytogeography, it is difficult to distinguish the underlying causes of the geographic patterns observed. However, inversion heterozygosity is not correlated with the diversity of potential cactus hosts.The evidence presented suggests that differential selection may be the main cause for the population structure. It is also possible to conclude that the inversion polymorphism of D. buzzatti is flexible rather than rigid.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright 漏 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 馃挋 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.