This article describes the evaluation of a comprehensive school-based asthma management program in an inner-city, largely African-American school system. All 54 elementary schools (combined enrollment 13,247 students) from a single urban school system participated in this study. Schools were randomly divided between immediate and delayed intervention programs. The intervention consisted of 3 separate educational programs (for school faculty/staff, students with asthma, and peers without asthma) and medical management for the children with asthma (including an Individual Asthma Action Plan, medications, and peakflow meters). Children with asthma were identified using a case detection program and 736 were enrolled into the intervention study. No significant differences were observed in school absences, grade point average, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations between the immediate and delayed intervention groups. Significant increases in knowledge were observed in the immediate intervention group. This study of a school-based asthma management education and medical intervention program did not show any differences between the intervention and control groups on morbidity outcomes. Our experience leads us to believe that such measures are difficult to impact and are not always reliable. Future researchers should be aware of the problems NIH Public Access

This paper describes an asthma screening procedure developed to identify children with asthma for an intervention study. Students were classified into three categories based on questionnaire responses (previous asthma, suspected asthma, and no evidence of asthma). Those classified as suspected asthma by questionnaire underwent further testing including spirometry and exercise challenge. Using the questionnaire alone, the measured asthma prevalence was 32%; the addition of spirometry and step testing reduced this estimate to 9.89%. The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed in 96% of children who saw the study physician. This screening procedure can identify school children with suspected undiagnosed asthma.

ABSTRACT. Objective. The purpose of this study was to validate a 3-stage asthma case-detection procedure for elementary school-aged children.Methods. The study was performed in 10 elementary schools in 4 inner-city school systems, with a total enrollment of 3539 children. Results of the case-detection procedure were compared with the diagnosis of an asthma specialist study physician, to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the case-detection procedure.Results. Ninety-eight percent of children returned the asthma symptoms questionnaires, and 79% of those children consented to additional testing. Results indicated that the 3-stage procedure had good validity, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 82%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. A 2-stage procedure using questionnaires and spirometry had similar validity, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 78%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. However, given the time and expense associated with the 2-or 3-stage procedure and the difficulty of obtaining physician follow-up evaluation of the case-detection diagnosis, schools may prefer to use a 2-item questionnaire that has a lower sensitivity (66%) but higher specificity (96%) and predictive value (95%).Conclusions. Case-detection programs are generally well received by school personnel and can identify children with unrecognized or undiagnosed disease, as well as those with a current diagnosis but poorly controlled disease. This study yields substantial information regarding the validity, yield, and specific types of children who might be identified with the use of such procedures. For the choice of the method of case detection used in a school, the strengths and weaknesses of each procedure, as well as the resources available for case detection, physician referral, and follow-up procedures, must be considered.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a simple submaximal "step-test" could be used as an exercise challenge to identify elementary school students with suspected but undiagnosed asthma. This article also describes a protocol for exercise testing that can be used in epidemiological evaluations. School age children grades 1-4 with suspected but undiagnosed asthma were identified by a 12-item questionnaire completed by a parent or guardian. Only students identified with suspected asthma by questionnaire were exercise challenged on a step-test it baseline spirometry was normal and there was no contraindication for intense aerobic activity. Possible asthma was defined as a 15% or greater decrease in FEV1 or a 25% or greater decrease in FEF25-75 from baseline at either 3 or 10 minutes. The exercise protocol included spirometry before and after stepping continuously for 5 minutes at an exercise intensity sufficient to maintain a heart rate between 150 and 200 beats per minute. Heart rate was continuously monitored throughout the exercise period. Testing was completed at school. No complications occurred during the exercise testing. Exercise testing was completed on 548 students with suspected undiagnosed asthma. Thirty students (6%) had exercise test changes in pulmonary function that met established criteria for suspecting asthma. A board-certified pediatric allergist/immunologist or private physician examined 26 of the 30 students with positive exercise testing. Asthma was diagnosed in 23 (88.89%) of these students. All students with impaired pulmonary function after exercise were able to return to class after a short period of observation. In conclusion, a simple, reproducible school-based exercise protocol can be used to identify students with suspected undiagnosed asthma.

No abstract