BACKGROUND VX-445 is a next-generation cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) corrector designed to restore Phe508del CFTR protein function in patients with cystic fibrosis when administered with tezacaftor and ivacaftor (VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor). METHODS We evaluated the effects of VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor on Phe508del CFTR protein processing, trafficking, and chloride transport in human bronchial epithelial cells. On the basis of in vitro activity, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial was conducted to evaluate oral VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor in patients heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation and a minimal-function mutation (Phe508del– MF) and in patients homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation (Phe508del–Phe508del) after tezacaftor–ivacaftor run-in. Primary end points were safety and absolute change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline. RESULTS In vitro, VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor significantly improved Phe508del CFTR protein processing, trafficking, and chloride transport to a greater extent than any two of these agents in dual combination. In patients with cystic fibrosis, VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor had an acceptable safety and side-effect profile. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. The treatment also resulted in an increased percentage of predicted FEV1 of up to 13.8 points in the Phe508del–MF group (P<0.001). In patients in the Phe508del–Phe508del group, who were already receiving tezacaftor–ivacaftor, the addition of VX-445 resulted in an 11.0-point increase in the percentage of predicted FEV1 (P<0.001). In both groups, there was a decrease in sweat chloride concentrations and improvement in the respiratory domain score on the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire–Revised. CONCLUSIONS The use of VX-445–tezacaftor–ivacaftor to target Phe508del CFTR protein resulted in increased CFTR function in vitro and translated to improvements in patients with cystic fibrosis with one or two Phe508del alleles. This approach has the potential to treat the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis in approximately 90% of patients. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX16–445-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03227471; and EudraCT number, 2017 −0 00797 −1 1.)

CFTR modulator therapy with tezacaftor-ivacaftor or ivacaftor alone was efficacious in patients with cystic fibrosis who were heterozygous for the Phe508del deletion and a CFTR residual-function mutation. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and others; EXPAND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02392234 .).

Background Phenotypic presentations in young children with asthma are varied and may contribute to differential responses to asthma controller medications. Methods The Individualized Therapy for Asthma in Toddlers (INFANT) study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial in children age 12-59 months (n=300) with asthma necessitating treatment with daily controller (Step 2) therapy. Participants completed a 2-8 week run-in period followed by three crossover periods with daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), daily leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), and as-needed ICS treatment co-administered with albuterol. The primary outcome was differential response to asthma medication based on a composite measure of asthma control. The primary analysis involved two stages: determination of differential response, and assessment of whether three pre-specified features (aeroallergen sensitization, previous exacerbations, sex) predicted differential response. Results 74% (170 of 230) of children with analyzable data had a differential response to the three treatment strategies. Within differential responders, the probability of best response was highest for daily ICS and was predicted by aeroallergen sensitization, but not exacerbation history or sex. The probability of best response to daily ICS was further increased in children with both aeroallergen sensitization and blood eosinophils ≥300/μL. In these children, daily ICS was associated with more asthma control days and fewer exacerbations compared to the other treatments. Conclusions In young children with asthma necessitating Step 2 treatment, phenotyping with aeroallergen sensitization and blood eosinophils is useful for guiding treatment selection and identifies children with a high exacerbation probability for whom treatment with daily ICS is beneficial despite possible risks of growth suppression.

Induced sputum has been used to study airway inflammation. We sought to determine whether markers of infection and inflammation in induced sputum were a useful and safe outcome measure in cystic fibrosis. We hypothesized that bacterial density and inflammatory content of induced sputum would decrease after antibiotic therapy. Induced sputum was assayed for bacterial density, cell count, and differential and inflammatory markers before and after treatment with intravenous antibiotics. Fifty-five of the 72 subjects enrolled (mean age +/- SD 18.2 +/- 7.9 years) completed the study. FEV1 increased by an average 0.3 +/- 0.3 L (10.4 +/- 8.7% predicted FEV1), p<0.0001; density of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus decreased by 2.4 +/- 3.1 log10 cfu/g (p<0.0005) and 4.0 +/- 2.3 log10 cfu/ml (p<0.0001), respectively; neutrophil count decreased by 0.4 +/- 0.6 log10 cells/ml (p<0.0001), interleukin-8 concentration by 0.5 +/- 1.3 log10 pg/ml (p<0.05), and neutrophil elastase by 0.4 +/- 0.7 log10 microg/ml (p<0.005). Seven of 127 (6%) sputum induction procedures showed a decrease in FEV1 of 20% or more. We conclude that markers in induced sputum may be useful, noninvasive outcome measures to assess response to therapies in cystic fibrosis studies.