Tuberculosis (TB) is still a major health problem, especially in the developing countries. The combination of antituberculosis drugs are generally recommended for the treatment of tuberculosis. Van Crevel study in Jakarta found that most (70%) of patients with pulmonary TB who received combined antituberculosis drugs with standard (450 mg) dose rifampicin had very low plasma rifampicin level. Based on this results, TB Research and Clinical Trial Centre Bandung & University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands conduct the study which compared clinical outcome between standard and high (600 mg) dose of rifampicin. Most of antituberculosis drugs currently available are very low in causing acute and chronic toxicities, however we must keep aware of side effect during the treatment. The most serious adverse effect of several drugs is liver damage (drug induced hepatitis) and potentially fatal hepatitis. To detect liver demage earlier aspartate aminotransferase( AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) serum level were examined during antituberculosis treatment. The aim of this study was to determine AST and ALT serum level at intensif phase of antituberculosis treatment with standard and high dose rifampicin. The study had been done from August 2003 to September 2004 at Dr Hasan Sadikin Hospital and Balai Pengobatan Penyakit Paruparu, Bandung. The subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups. The first group consisted of patients with category I antituberculosis drugs with standard dose rifampicin and the second group patients also category I with high dose rifampicin. Aspartate aminotransferase and ALT serum level were examined at week 0 (before treatment), 2nd, 4th, and 8th. This was randomized clinical trial with paralel design study. Statistical analysis used paired t test to compare the dose effect of rifampicin to AST and ALT serum level changes, t independent test to compared mean difference of AST and ALT serum level changes which is projected by profile analysis. p value < 5%.. The prevalence of the hepatotoxicity were 17.39% of standard dose and 18.17% of high dose rifampicin. The hepatotoxicity were mild and moderate level,and it was already present at 2 weeks of therapy. There were no significant difference of AST and ALT serum level beetween those two groups. Conclusion: In this study antituberculosis drugs with high dose rifampicin were safe for TB patients.
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including dialysis and transplant patients, are at greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 due to kidney dysfunction and preexisting comorbidities. To date, a specific guideline on managing these high-risk patients infected with COVID-19 has not been established. As the current management of COVID-19 comprises mainly experimental drugs, the authors aim to provide information on dosing adjustments at different stages of kidney dysfunction and notable renal side effects. We performed a nonsystematical review of currently available COVID-19 drugs exploring several different clinical trial databases and search browsers. Several antivirals and monoclonal antibodies used in COVID-19 treatment require dosage adjustments in kidney dysfunction. In a global pandemic setting, nephrologists need to consider the appropriate dosage according to the renal function and closely monitor the side effects of different drug combinations to obtain the optimum therapeutic effect while avoiding further renal damage. Further studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of these drugs in renal patients.
The purpose of this review is to outline the currently available circulating biomarkers to predict diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Studies have extensively reported the association between DR and DKD, suggesting the presence of common pathways of microangiopathy. The presence of other ocular complications including diabetic cataracts may hinder the detection of retinopathy, which may affect the visual outcome after surgery. Unlike DKD screening, the detection of DR requires complex, costly machines and trained technicians. Recognizing potential biological markers related to glycation and oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, basement membrane thickening, angiogenesis, and thrombosis as well as novel molecular markers involved in the microangiopathy process may be useful as predictors of retinopathy and identify those at risk of DR progression, especially in cases where retinal visualization becomes a clinical challenge. Further investigations could assist in deciding which biomarkers possess the highest predictive power to predict retinopathy in clinical settings.
Indonesia is one of the countries with the highest multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cases in the world. Rapid molecular test using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay is one of the detection methods for MDR-TB. Early detection of MDR-TB is crucial for early initiation of treatment. However, Xpert MTB/RIF assay only detects the rpoB gene mutations associated with Rifampicin resistance. Recently, WHO recommends the use of Pyrosequencing, a DNA sequencing method that can detect not only the rpoB gene but also katG and/or inhA gene mutations associated with Isoniazid resistance. The aims of this study were to compare the interpretation between the two methods and to determine the differences in codon mutation position detection of the rpoB gene and mutation detection of the katG and/or inhA gene. This was a cross-sectional comparative observational study on patients ≥18 years old interpreted as RR-TB patients based on Xpert MTB/RIF assay results who had not received MDR-TB drugs at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia. Results showed there were 40 Rifampicin-resistant TB subjects interpreted by Xpert MTB/RIF assay while Pyrosequencing interpreted 30 MDR-TB, 9 RR-TB and one Isoniazid-resistant TB subjects in January - February 2020. The detection of rpoB gene codon mutation position between Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Pyrosequencing methods was not significantly different (p=0.389). Pyrosequencing had detected 27 katG gene mutations, 3 inhA gene mutations, one katG and inhA gene mutation. To conclude, Pyrosequencing can be used for accurate detection of Rifampicin and Isoniazid resistance in MDR-TB.
Gangguan ginjal akut (GgGA) merupakan penurunan fungsi ginjal secara mendadak yang ditandai dengan peningkatan kreatinin serum ≥0,3 mg/dL atau meningkat >1,5 kali dari kadar sebelumnya atau penurunan urine output (UO) <0,5 mL per jam selama >6 jam. Sepsis merupakan penyebab tersering GgGA dengan angka kejadian berkisar 20-50% dan angka kematian mendekati 70%. Kadar neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) urine penderita GgGA dapat meningkat secara cepat dan lebih awal dibandingkan dengan kadar kreatinin serum sehingga NGAL dapat dijadikan penanda diagnosis GgGA. Penelitian bertujuan mengetahui validitas NGAL urine sebagai penanda diagnosis GgGA pada penderita sepsis. Sebanyak 50 sampel urine diambil dari penderita sepsis di Unit Gawat Darurat (UGD), Intensive Care Unit (ICU), dan Medical Intermediate Care (MIC) di Rumah Sakit Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung selama Februari sampai Mei 2010 dan dilakukan pemeriksaan kadar NGAL urine dengan metode enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan uji nonparametrik Mann-Whitney, kurva receiver operating characteristic (ROC), dan uji validitas. Hasil penelitian didapatkan kadar NGAL urine penderita sepsis dengan GgGA lebih tinggi secara bermakna dibandingkan dengan penderita sepsis tanpa GgGA (3.380 ng/mL berbanding 116 ng/mL; p<0,001). Pada cutoff point 107 ng/mL, NGAL urine memiliki sensitivitas 100%, spesifisitas 36%, positive predictive value (PPV) 60,9%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100%, dan akurasi 68%. Simpulan, kadar NGAL urine memiliki validitas yang baik dan dapat dijadikan sebagai penanda diagnosis terjadinya GgGA pada penderita sepsis. [MKB. 2012;44(2):121-6].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.