Micafungin as primary or salvage therapy proved efficacious and safe in high-risk patients with IA, although patient numbers are small in the micafungin-only groups.
Between 1996 and 2004, a total of 708 patients were enrolled in the acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) '96 and '02 studies of the East German Study Group (OSHO). Of these, 138 patients (19.5%) had unfavourable cytogenetics defined as complex karyotype, del (5q)/-5, del (7q)/-7, abn (3q26) and abn (11q23). In all, 77 (56%) achieved complete remission 1 (CR1) after induction chemotherapy and were eligible for haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). HCT was performed after a median of two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy (CT) in the AML '96 and one cycle in the AML '02 study (P ¼ 0.03). After a median follow-up of 19 months, overall survival (OS) at two years was significantly better in the donor group (52 ± 9%) versus the no-donor group (24±8%; P ¼ 0.005). Differences in outcomes were mainly because of a lower relapse incidence in patients after HCT (39±11%) compared with a higher relapse incidence in patients undergoing CT (77 ± 10%; P ¼ 0.0005). Treatment-related mortality was low and not statistically significantly different between the two treatment groups (15 ± 7 and 5 ± 5% for HCT and chemotherapy, respectively; P ¼ 0.49).We conclude that early HCT from related or unrelated donors led to significantly better OS and leukaemia-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with unfavourable karyotype.
The cumulative incidence of second malignancies is 5.4% at 25 years and 8.3% at 35 years; these figures may be slight underestimates. The DKKR is an epidemiologic registry containing no data about treatment, so the effect of treatment on the risk of second malignancies could not be studied. The acquisition and evaluation of treatment data for the overall cohort is currently one of the main tasks for research on the late sequelae of childhood cancer. This may enable conclusions to be drawn about whether treatment strategies that have been introduced to lessen the risk of a second malignancy actually have the desired effect.
Background: Malignant bone tumors are a rare group of childhood cancer. Materials and methods: This study describes incidence rates, survival probabilities, and time trends for 1831 children below 15 years of age with a bone tumor registered at the population-based German Childhood Cancer Registry between 1987 and 2011. Results: Overall age-standardized annual incidence rate (ASR) was 5.5 per million. Osteosarcomas (ASR 2.8) and Ewing tumors (ASR 2.6) were the most frequent diagnostic groups. The incidence of bone tumors overall tended to increase slightly over time by 0.7% each year on average. Thirty-nine of the bone tumor cases reported were subsequent primaries and not included into the survival analysis. Survival probabilities remained largely constant. Discussion: Possibly survival was largely constant because chemotherapy has not changed much over time. Overall, the results are similar to other results reported from Europe.
A median number of two (range 1-7) BPV treatment cycles were given to the patients. The majority of the patients (n = 54; 69 %) responded after at least one cycle of chemotherapy with 3 CR, 10 nCR, 10 VGPR and 31 PR. Median PFS and OS for patients without severe hematological toxicities due to previous treatments (n = 45) were 11 and 50 months, respectively. Outcome for these patients was significantly better than that for patients with severe hematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4, n = 33) with a PFS, and OS of 3 months (p < 0.05) and 5 months (p < 0.001), respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with few significant side effects in patients without severe hematological toxicities due to previous treatments. These results indicate that the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine and prednisone is well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.