Frac hits or "frac bashing" is a fracture-initiated well-to-well communication event that can create production losses (or gains), and on occasion, mechanical damage when frac energy from a stimulated well extends into the drainage area or directly contacts an adjacent or offset well. Pressure increases have been detected in wells at distances ranging from hundreds to thousands of feet from the stimulated well. While these in-zone frac hit events do not pose an environmental problem if there is no failure of containment, there can be some alteration of the production potential in one or both of the wells involved. Frac hits along the preferential fracture plane were an uncommon but known event when the completion method only involved vertical wells, but the rate of incidence has increased sharply as the preferred completion method has shifted to relatively closely-spaced, multiple fractured horizontal wells (MFHW) in low permeability formations such as the mudstone rocks commonly referred to as shales. Mechanical damage within the well and success of methods of prevention, damage control and remediation will be examined by case histories and published contexts of incidents in several basins, but will not be the main goal of the paper. The primary effort will focus on examining causes of production loss and duration of the loss, including looking at production declines pre-hit and post-hit. Known causes include in-situ stress alteration potential, timing of fracture closure, near-wellbore proppant loss, liquid loading, rock-fluid interactions, sludges and wetting factors. Also considered will be geological effects such as regional fractures and linked natural fracture clusters. A main objective will be to identify pressure transient, chemical analysis or other monitoring techniques to identify location and type of damage. Remedial operations are most effective when the potential cause of production losses can be ranked probabilistically and the depth of the production-reducing event can be estimated as near-field or far-field. Analyzing this data will also assist in defining whether chemical or mechanical treatments such as refracturing or a hybrid treatment system may be the best approach.

No abstract

Would you rather have youth, or power and money? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, a 20-something software engineer, after an extensive physical exam, is brought into meet the elderly head of the mega-corporation he works for. The wheelchair bound owner makes him an offer; they will switch bodies. The wealthy tycoon gets the young man’s body, and nothing else, while the young man gets the old man’s body and all the wealth and power that comes with it in the remaining years. The young software engineer has a sister in need of money medical expenses, and he thinks of all the good he could do. He accepts the offer and they switch bodies. The young man almost immediately regrets his decision.

To what degree do serious issues require serious consequences for politicians who fail to address them? Should politicians who fail to keep campaign promises have greater consequences than not being reelected? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Brian Greenwald is running a unique presidential campaign. Not only is he a single-issue candidate for stopping global warming, but an ominous figure follows him everywhere with the promise to kill him at the end of his term if he fails to move the needle. The electorate knows this, and elects Greenwald President in a landslide. Everything he does in office is focused on the single goal of lower greenhouse gas emissions. At the end of his first term emissions have gone flat, but not down. By the end of his second term, even after exceptional efforts, global greenhouse gas emissions have failed to significantly fall. Good to his word, the ominous figure kills him for failing to deliver.

What if the Devil were real and you could, and did, kill him? What, does the Devil stand for in society, and what might change about society in the event of his death? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Simon is put on trial for having, literally, killed the devil. He did it through trickery, of course. He told the Devil that he (the Devil) was a cheap peddler of a product, fear. But, because he was immortal, he would never truly understand the product he pushed on others. The Devil asserts he fears nothing and, to prove it, removes his immortality from his being. Simon kills him. And now Simon is on trial. It is unethical to kill a purely evil thing? And, if the Devil is dead, why are bad things still happening in the world?