The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19), was reported to the World Health Organization in late 2019. This disease quickly evolved into a public health concern and was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. COVID-19’s high transmission rate and potential to cause a spectrum of systemic diseases makes it imperative for researchers and clinicians worldwide to collaborate and develop a strategy to manage and contain this disease. Studies have shown a wide range of hematological abnormalities and virus-related coagulopathies in affected patients, resulting in an increased propensity to develop serious thrombotic complications or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in severe cases. The fatal implications of coagulopathy in the form of pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebral infarction compelled us to study in-depth the pathophysiology and treatment options related to COVID-19. This analysis reviews published reports on patients with confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection and associated coagulopathy, defined as abnormalities in the coagulation parameters prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), antithrombin time, fibrinogen, fibrin degradation products, and D-dimer. In this review, we present the hematological manifestations of COVID-19, focusing on virus-associated coagulopathy and relevant pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and treatment.

No abstract

11536 Background: The diagnosis of cancer can adversely affect mental wellbeing. In addition to treating cancer, the emotional wellbeing of patients must simultaneously be addressed. A previous pilot exploring the feasibility of creative writing workshop (CWW) in cancer patients showed apositive effect on patients’ mental health. Methods: To longitudinally evaluate the efficacy of CWW on mood, we conducted a phase II study with cancer patients (any stage, any cancer type); randomized 2:1 to CWW vs. active control (AC). Patients in the CWW arm attended at least 4, 1.5-hour bi-monthly CWW x 8 wks, whereas AC patients completed independent writing at home with the help of a book (bi-monthly x 8wks). We used validated tools, [Emotional Thermometer Scales (ETS), PHQ-9, GAD-7] to assess changes in overall mood, depression, and anxiety. Primary end point: a) ETS scores before and after intervention b) Changes in depression and anxiety based on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. We present results from ETS scores. Descriptive statistics were generated for these quantitative scales measured in each group, pre and post intervention. Comparisons between groups (gp) were made using Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests. All tests were two sided and the statistical significance level used was 0.05. Results: Amongst evaluable patients, N of 50 (demographics in table below), twenty-six patients in the CWW gp attended at least one class and 19 attended at least 4 classes. Patients in CWW showed significant mood improvement vs. AC when comparing the final overall ETS (p=0.0063). Three of the five sub-scale ETS scores were significantly lower for the CWW vs. AC gp: anxiety (p=0.0027), depression (p=0.0009), and anger (p=0.0027). Conclusions: Group led CWW have a positive effect on mood. Our results suggest potential therapeutic benefit of this intervention on the emotional wellbeing of cancer patients. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the effect of CWW in cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03536702. [Table: see text]

BackgroundCancer diagnosis can adversely affect mental well-being and overall clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of a group-led creative writing workshop (CWW) on mood in patients with cancer prospectively.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution phase II study. Sixty adult patients with cancer (any type or stage) were randomised 2:1 to CWW (4×CWW sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks) versus active control (AC) (independent writing at home with the help of a book, four sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks). The total study duration was 6 months with a follow-up of up to 3 months. Primary objective: changes in overall mood, depression and anxiety symptoms before and after intervention in both arms. Emotional Thermometer Scale (ETS) was used to assess changes in patients’ mood. Additionally, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 were used to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms.ResultsOf 50 evaluable patients (CWW 34, AC 17), 26 patients in the CWW arm attended at least one class and 19 attended at least four classes. Patients in CWW had significant immediate improvement in the overall ETS (post vs preclass scores; p<0.0001, 95% CI −4.31 to −2.47). Four of the five subscale ETS scores were significantly lower for the CWW arm: distress (p=0.0346, 95% CI −2.6 to −0.1), anxiety (p=0.0366, 95% CI −4.1 to −0.2), depression (p=0.0441, 95% CI −3.9 to −0.1) and anger (p=0.0494, 95% CI −3.3 to 0). No significant differences were seen in the AC arm. No significant differences were observed in the PHQ-9 or the GAD-7 scores.ConclusionCWW had a positive effect on mood based on ETS scores, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit among patients with cancer.

Coronavirus Disease 2019, caused by the virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a pandemic first discovered in Wuhan, China which has claimed over 1.7 million lives to date across the globe as of 24 December 2020. As the virus spreads across the world affecting millions of patients, there has been a massive movement to discover readily available and effective treatment options including vaccines. One of the limiting factors in treating the disease is its varied presentation and effect in patients, ranging from asymptomatic patients to those left in intensive care units, intubated and fighting for their lives. There are numerous clinical trials and small-scale studies underway to investigate potential treatment options. However, very few studies and drugs demonstrated efficacy while many more are under investigation, leaving care teams dependent on supportive care coupled with experimental treatment options. In this review, we summarize the various treatment options explored to treat COVID-19, discussing possible the mechanisms of fighting the virus.