No abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of caspofungin for invasive aspergillosis (IA).Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains an important cause of infectious morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. It is the most common invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients with hematological malignancies (5). Current first-line therapies with liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole fail in approximately 50% of patients. With 12-week mortality rates as high as 28%, new approaches are urgently needed (7, 12).High-dose liposomal amphotericin B (i.e., 10 mg/kg per day for the first 2 weeks of treatment) did not yield better outcomes than a standard dose of 3 mg/kg per day but resulted in higher rates of renal adverse events (AEs) (7). Dose escalation of voriconazole is not pursued due to the nonlinear disposition of the compound and a narrow therapeutic window. Antifungal combination therapy is another attractive strategy, but it has yet to be proven superior to monotherapy (22).Caspofungin is generally well tolerated and exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties (21). Unlike the triazoles, it is not metabolized through the cytochrome P450 enzyme system (11). The drug had excellent efficacy and safety results in clinical trials of candidiasis (1,17,23,24) and was effective as salvage therapy for IA after amphotericin B or itraconazole proved ineffective or toxic (15), and a large-scale study in neutropenic patients with persistent fever demonstrated an efficacy similar to that of liposomal amphotericin B but improved tolerability (26). Two recently published trials investigated the caspofungin standard maintenance doses of 50 mg once a day (QD) for first-line treatment of IA and yielded response rates of 33 and 42% (13, 25). While these response rates were below the expected outcomes (7, 12), they have been attributed to the severely ill patient groups enrolled in these trials and the rigorous enforcement of the EORTC/MSG

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) continue to cause considerable morbidity and mortality in patients with haematological malignancy. Diagnosis of IFD is difficult, with the sensitivity of the gold standard tests (culture and histopathology) often reported to be low, which may at least in part be due to sub-optimal sampling or subsequent handling in the routine microbiological laboratory. Therefore, a working group of the European Conference in Infections in Leukaemia was convened in 2009 with the task of reviewing the classical diagnostic procedures and providing recommendations for their optimal use. The recommendations were presented and approved at the ECIL-3 conference in September 2009. Although new serological and molecular tests are examined in separate papers, this review focuses on sample types, microscopy and culture procedures, antifungal susceptibility testing and imaging. The performance and limitations of these procedures are discussed and recommendations are provided on when and how to use them and how to interpret the results.