No abstract

No abstract

The sediment-buried eastern flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge provides a unique environment for studying the thermal nature and geochemical consequences of hydrothermal circulation in young ocean crust. Just 18 km east of the spreading axis, where the sea-floor age is 0.62 Ma, sediments lap onto the ridge flank and create a sharp boundary between sediment-free and sediment-covered igneous crust. Farther east, beneath the nearly continuous turbidite sediment cover of Cascadia Basin, the buried basement topography is extremely smooth in some areas and rough in others. At a few isolated locations, small volcanic edifices penetrate the sediment surface. An initial cruise in 1978 and two subsequent cruises in 1988 and 1990 on this sedimented ridge flank have produced extensive single-channel seismic coverage, detailed heat flow surveys co-located with seismic lines, and pore-fluid geochemical profiles of piston and gravity cores taken over heat flow anomalies. Complementary multichannel seismic reflection data were collected across the ridge crest and eastern flank in 1985 and 1989. Preliminary results of these studies provide important new information about hydrothermal circulation in ridge flank environments. Near areas of extensive basement outcrop, ventilated hydrothermal circulation in the upper igneous crust maintains temperatures of less than 10–20 °C; geochemically, basement fluids are virtually identical to seawater. Turbidite sediment forms an effective hydrologic and geochemical seal that restricts greatly any local exchange of fluid between the igneous crust and the ocean. Once sediment thickness reaches a few tens of metres, local vertical fluid flux through the sea floor is limited to rates of less than a few millimetres per year. Fluids and heat are transported over great distances laterally in the igneous crust beneath sediment however. Heat flow, basement temperatures, and basement fluid compositions are unaffected by ventilated circulation only where continuous sediment cover extends more than 15–20 km away from areas of extensive outcrop. Where small basement edifices penetrate the sediment cover in areas that are otherwise fully sealed, fluids discharge at rates sufficient to cause large heat flow and pore-fluid geochemical anomalies in the immediate vicinity of the outcrops. After complete sediment burial, hydrothermal circulation continues in basement. Estimated basement temperatures and, to the limited degree observed, fluid compositions are uniform over large areas despite large local variations in sediment thickness. Because of the resulting strong relationship between heat flow and sediment thickness, it is not possible, in most areas, to detect any systematic pattern of heat flow that might be associated with cellular hydrothermal circulation in basement. However, an exception to this occurs at one location where the sediment thickness is sufficiently uniform to allow detection of a systematic variation in heat flow that can probably be ascribed to cellular circulation. At that location, temperatures at the sediment–basement interface vary smoothly between about 40 and 50 °C, with a half-wavelength of about 700 m. A permeable-layer thickness of similar dimension is inferred by assuming that circulation is cellular with an aspect ratio of roughly one. This thickness is commensurate with the subbasement depth to a strong seismic reflector observed commonly in the region. Seismic velocities in the igneous crustal layer above this reflector have been observed to be low near the ridge crest and to increase significantly where the transition from ventilated to sealed hydrothermal conditions occurs, although no associated reduction in permeability can be ascertained from the thermal data.

Groundwater flow in high‐relief mountainous terrain is modeled to examine how geology, surface topography, climate, and regional heat flow influence the pattern and magnitude of an advective thermal disturbance. A numerical procedure is used to estimate the position of the water table within constraints provided by the available infiltration rate and the permeability of the mountain massif. Results show that where the water table is located at depth within the mountain massif, the rate of groundwater recharge, rather than permeability, is the appropriate factor to characterize the potential for an advective disturbance. Thermal disturbances should be assessed within the framework of the two‐dimensional character of the flow system because interpretations based on one‐dimensional models are prone to significant error. Modeling of site‐specific systems can exploit the existence of a permeability “window,” where temperatures in discharge areas and in springs discharging from fracture zones reach peak values. Temperatures of thermal springs reflect the complex interaction between flow within the mountain massif and flow through permeable fracture zones. Consequently, simple calculations relating the geothermal gradient, depth of maximum groundwater circulation, and discharge temperature improperly represent the physics of the process.

No abstract