Oncology practice attributes warranting further testing were identified that may lower total spending for high-quality oncology care.
PURPOSE: To estimate the value of cancer care and to compare value among episodes of care, a transparent, reproducible, and standardized cost computation methodology is needed. Charges, claims, and reimbursements are related to cost but are nontransparent and proprietary. We developed a method to measure the cost of the following phases of care: (1) initial treatment with curative intent, (2) surveillance and survivorship care, and (3) relapse and end-of-life care. METHODS: We combined clinical data from our electronic health record, the state cancer registry, and the Social Security Death Index. We analyzed the care of patients with breast cancer and mapped Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to the corresponding cost conversion factor and date in the CMS Medicare fee schedule. To account for varying duration of episodes of care, we computed a cost of care per day (CCPD) for each patient. RESULTS: Median CCPD for initial treatment was $29.45 in US dollars (USD), the CCPD for surveillance and survivorship care was $2.45 USD, and the CCPD for relapse care was $13.80 USD. Among the three breast cancer types (hormone receptor-positive or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative), there was no difference in CCPD. Relapsed patients in the most expensive surveillance CCPD group had significantly shorter survival. CONCLUSION: We developed a method to identify high-value oncology care—cost of care per patient per day (CCPD)—in episodes of initial, survivorship, and relapse care. The methodology can help identify positive deviants (who have developed best practices) delivering high-value care. Merging our data with claims data from third-party payers can increase the accuracy and validity of the CCPD.
10 Background: Cost of breast cancer survivor surveillance, of survivorship care and of variation in care practices are unknown. Furthermore, it is not known whether intense surveillance care adds value. We developed a method to measure the cost of surveillance to account for varying follow-up duration [cost of care per day (CCPD)], and explored the impact of surveillance cost on survival. Methods: We queried the Oncoshare database {Kurian et al Cancer 2014}, which amalgamates data from Stanford Health Care’s (SHC) electronic health record (EHR) (imaging, infused drugs, inpatient and outpatient facility and professional services), from the California Cancer Registry, and the Social Security Death Index. We included breast cancer patients diagnosed 2000-2014, Stages 0-III who had surgery, chemotherapy or radiation treatment at SHC, and who had more than two visits at SHC within 3 years of their treatment completion. We tallied Common Procedural Terminology (CPT©) codes assigned to each service, and mapped each CPT code to the corresponding code and date in the CMS Medicare fee schedule. For patients with breast cancer relapse, we explored the post-relapse survival of the costliest 20% compared with the other patients. Results: CCPD was $2.45 for care delivered at SHC. Among the three breast cancer subtypes (luminal, Her-2 over-expressed and triple negative) there was no difference in cost. Among patients who relapsed, those in the most expensive 20% CCPD had significantly shorter survival than other patients. The high-cost patients had more co-morbidity [cerebrovascular disease (4% for low cost vs 7% for high), chronic pulmonary disease (5% vs 10%), CHF (2% vs 7%), diabetes (4% vs 7%), liver disease (4% vs 9%)]. Conclusions: Cost of care per day (CCPD) is a useful metric to assess value of surveillance and survivorship care, and is also applicable to initial treatment and post-relapse care, to identify “positive deviants” ( those who have developed best practices) in high value care delivery. We captured only costs for treatment at SHC, and merging our data with claims data from 3rd party carriers could increase the accuracy and validity of the CCPD. We identified a model for further testing to reduce total spending for high-quality oncology care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.