<sec id="s1">Objectives: Developing the proactive identification of patients with end of life care (EoLC) needs within ambulance paramedic clinical practice may improve access to care for patients not benefitting from EoLC services at present. To inform development of this role, this study aims to assess whether ambulance paramedics currently identify EoLC patients, are aware of identification guidance and believe this role is appropriate for their practice. </sec> <sec id="s2">Methods: Between 4 November 2019 and 5 January 2020, registered paramedics from nine English NHS ambulance service trusts were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire initially explored current practice and awareness, employing multiple-choice questions. The Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF PIG) was then presented as an example of EoLC assessment guidance, and further questions, permitting free-text responses, explored attitudes towards performing this role. </sec> <sec id="s3">Results: 1643 questionnaires were analysed. Most participants (79.9%; n = 1313) perceived that they attended a patient who was unrecognised as within the last year of life on at least a monthly basis. Despite 72.0% (n = 1183) of paramedics indicating that they had previously made an EoLC referral to a General Practitioner, only 30.5% (n = 501) were familiar with the GSF PIG and of those only 25.9% (n = 130) had received training in its use. Participants overwhelmingly believed that they could (94.4%; n = 1551) and should (97.0%; n = 1594) perform this role, yet current barriers were identified as the inaccessibility of a patient’s medical records, inadequate EoLC education and communication difficulties. Consequently, facilitators to performing this role were identified as the provision of training in EoLC assessment guidance and establishing accessible, responsive EoLC referral pathways. </sec> <sec id="s4">Conclusions: Provision of EoLC assessment training and dedicated EoLC referral pathways should facilitate ambulance paramedics’ roles in the timely recognition of EoLC patients, potentially addressing current inequalities in access to EoLC. </sec>

<sec id="s1"> Aims: Developing the proactive identification of patients with end of life care (EoLC) needs within ambulance paramedic clinical practice may improve access to care for patients not benefitting from EoLC services at present. To inform development of this role, this study aims to assess whether ambulance paramedics currently identify EoLC patients, are aware of identification guidance and believe this role is appropriate for their practice. </sec> <sec id="s2"> Methods: Between 4 November 2019 and 5 January 2020, registered paramedics from nine English NHS ambulance service trusts were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire initially explored current practice and awareness, employing multiple-choice questions. The Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF PIG) was then presented as an example of EoLC assessment guidance and further questions, permitting free-text responses, explored attitudes towards performing this role. </sec> <sec id="s3"> Results: 1643 questionnaires were analysed. Most participants (79.9%; n = 1313) perceived that they attended a patient who was formally unrecognised as within the last year of life on at least a monthly basis. Despite 72.0% (n = 1183) of paramedics indicating that they had previously made an EoLC referral to a General Practitioner (GP), only 30.5% (n = 501) were familiar with the GSF PIG and of those only 25.9% (n = 130) had received training in its use. Participants overwhelmingly believed that they can (94.4%; n = 1551) and should (97.0%; n = 1594) perform this role, yet current barriers were identified as the inaccessibility of a patient’s medical records, inadequate EoLC education and communication difficulties. Consequently, facilitators to performing this role were identified as the provision of further training in EoLC assessment guidance and establishing accessible, responsive EoLC referral pathways. </sec> <sec id="s4"> Conclusion: Ambulance paramedics frequently encounter patients that they perceive are not receiving appropriate EoLC provision, and participants in this study overwhelmingly supported a role in highlighting this to primary care providers. Though many paramedics are already making referrals for these patients, the majority are performed without knowledge of validated EoLC assessment guidance. Provision of EoLC assessment training might therefore be expected to improve the timeliness and sensitivity of referrals, potentially addressing current inequalities in access to EoLC. The communication difficulties currently encountered when making a referral might be addressed by the provision of dedicated EoLC referral pathways. Future qualitative and quantitative evaluation of local initiatives providing both assessment training and referral pathways would be hugely beneficial for revealing the benefits and barriers associated with the development of this role in practice. </sec>

Objective -Investigate the impact to paramedic students of patient monitor simulators, when compared to manikin based simulators within an educational programme.Design -An exploratory study using an online questionnaire to gain qualitative and quantitative data.Setting -One London university delivering a paramedic science programme.Participants -A total of one hundred and thirty-six Paramedic students sponsored by a UK ambulance service were approached for this study. Data were received from forty-three respondents (32%).Main outcome measures -Comparison of simulators and their effect upon student development through the identification of the student's own perceived ability following use; perception of other's ability (fellow students studying same course) following use and perception of the two pieces of simulation equipment available.Results -The majority of respondents identified that simulation both increased their confidence and ability to demonstrate new knowledge and skills during simulation (97%) and further increased their ability to manage real patients (95%). Respondents agreed that there were advantages and disadvantages of using simulation, but these were not in line with those identified in previous studies. Instead of the human factors and non-technical skills outlined, students were much more practically focused on how the equipment performed.Conclusions -This study suggests that there is a clear link between simulation and increased student confidence, but any issues encountered with the simulator equipment can reduce this benefit causing the student's learning environment to falter. Transitioning to monitor based simulators is seen as a positive move, although the integration of manikins with this equipment is identified as being necessary.