Inhibition of glucose‐induced insulin secretion by interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β), or IL‐1β plus tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), was less marked when rat islets of Langerhans were cultured for 12 h with these cytokines in L‐arginine‐free medium as opposed to medium containing L‐arginine (1 mM). Inhibition of secretion by IL‐1β was further alleviated when islets were maintained in L‐arginine‐free medium supplemented with N‐ω‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (NAME), while synergism between IL‐1β plus TNF‐α was completely abolished. Tissue culture medium nitrite levels were raised in islets treated with IL‐1β or TNF‐α (48 h). Cytokine‐stimulated nitrite production was not observed in islets cultured with NAME (1 mM). In conclusion, an L‐arginine‐dependent nitric oxide generating mechanism is involved in the inhibition of insulin secretion by IL‐1β, and accounts for the phenomenon of synergism between IL‐1β and TNF‐α.

A variety of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) screening technologies have successfully partnered a number of GPCRs with their cognate ligands. GPCR-mediated β-arrestin recruitment is now recognized as a distinct intracellular signaling pathway, and ligand-receptor interactions may show a bias toward β-arrestin over classical GPCR signaling pathways. We hypothesized that the failure to identify native ligands for the remaining orphan GPCRs may be a consequence of biased β-arrestin signaling. To investigate this, we assembled 10 500 candidate ligands and screened 82 GPCRs using PathHunter β-arrestin recruitment technology. High-quality screening assays were validated by the inclusion of liganded receptors and the detection and confirmation of these established ligand-receptor pairings. We describe a candidate endogenous orphan GPCR ligand and a number of novel surrogate ligands. However, for the majority of orphan receptors studied, measurement of β-arrestin recruitment did not lead to the identification of cognate ligands from our screening sets. β-Arrestin recruitment represents a robust GPCR screening technology, and ligand-biased signaling is emerging as a therapeutically exploitable feature of GPCR biology. The identification of cognate ligands for the orphan GPCRs and the extent to which receptors may exist to preferentially signal through β-arrestin in response to their native ligand remain to be determined.

Variation in pharmacology and function of ligands at species orthologs can be a confounding feature in understanding the biology and role of poorly characterized receptors. Substantial selectivity in potency of a number of GPR35 agonists has previously been demonstrated between human and rat orthologs of this G protein-coupled receptor. Via a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay of induced interactions between GPR35 and ␤-arrestin-2, addition of the mouse ortholog to such studies indicated that, as for the rat ortholog, murine GPR35 displayed very low potency for pamoate, whereas potency for the reference GPR35 agonist zaprinast was intermediate between the rat and human orthologs. This pattern was replicated in receptor internalization and G protein activation assays. The effectiveness and mode of action of two recently reported GPR35 antagonists, methyl-5-[(tert-butylcarbamothioylhydrazinylidene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylate (CID-2745687) and 2-hydroxy-4-[4-(5Z)-5-[(E)-2-methyl-3-phenylprop-2-enylidene]-4-oxo-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl]butanoylamino)benzoic acid (ML-145), were investigated. Both CID-2745687 and ML-145 competitively inhibited the effects at human GPR35 of cromolyn disodium and zaprinast, two agonists that share an overlapping binding site. By contrast, although ML-145 also competitively antagonized the effects of pamoate, CID-2745687 acted in a noncompetitive fashion. Neither ML-145 nor CID-2745687 was able to effectively antagonize the agonist effects of either zaprinast or cromolyn disodium at either rodent ortholog of GPR35. These studies demonstrate that marked species selectivity of ligands at GPR35 is not restricted to agonists and considerable care is required to select appropriate ligands to explore the function of GPR35 in nonhuman cells and tissues.

Glucose-induced insulin secretion from islets cultured in the presence of interleukin-6 (IL-6) for 12-24 h was inhibited to a similar extent as when islets were treated with interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta). However, unlike IL-1 beta, IL-6 did not potentiate insulin secretion during an acute (30 min) exposure of islets to the cytokine, nor did it inhibit DNA synthesis during a 24 h culture period. A 12 h pretreatment of islets with tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) combined with IL-1 beta potentiated the inhibitory effect of IL-1 beta on secretion, such that 20 mM-glucose-induced insulin secretion was abolished. No synergistic inhibition of secretion was observed with TNF-alpha and IL-6. However, IL-1 beta and IL-6 were found to inhibit insulin secretion in an additive manner. These results suggest that IL-6 inhibits insulin secretion in a manner distinct from that of IL-1 beta, and that IL-6 is unlikely to mediate the inhibitory effects of IL-1 beta or TNF-alpha on rat islets of Langerhans.