Background: Infectious diseases are a global problem, the second human cause of death. Infectious diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria have been treated with a high degree of efficacy. However, even when the 20th century was considered the “golden age” of antibiotics, bacteria developed a different resistance mechanism to antibiotics. In 2017, the WHO issued an alert about 12 bacteria with an urgent need to develop new antibiotics. Aims: The aim of the present review is to analyze the current knowledge of the antibacterial activity of natural extract-based treatments against the pathogens listed by WHO. Methods: A systematic review of the literature in PubMed was performed to search for publications describing the use of natural extracts as antibiotics over bacteria. We focused on the Gram-Negative group. The exclusion criteria consisted of limiting papers on natural extracts tested over the bacteria culture related to eight selected bacteria, according to an alert issued by WHO in 2017, and seven plant extracts. Results: All the Gram-Negative bacteria listed in 2017 by WHO have been treated, with different degrees of advance, with some of the plant extracts and plant-based compounds reviewed. In general, the first approach is using inhibition disks applied over the bacterial biofilm in solid culture media. Discussion: While Salmonellae and P. aeruginosa have been extensively studied, over N. gonorrhoeae, A. baumannii have been tested with fewer natural extracts. Edible herbs are more often used, as well as artemisa and wine byproducts. In all cases, they are in the early stages of study, not being tested in patients at present. Conclusions: Plant extracts and plant-based compounds are effective as antibacterial, with minimal effects on the host cell. Furthermore, they are sustainable, environmentally friendly, and renewable.

Background: Antibiotic resistance is currently one of the biggest problems in public health. Infectious diseases are the second human death cause, and the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria increases mortality and morbidity rates. There is a growing clinical need for the development of new antibiotics. In this line, WHO issued an alert about 12 bacteria with an urgent need to develop new antibiotics. Aims: This review aims to analyze the current knowledge of their antibacterial activity against the gram-positive pathogens listed by WHO and their extraction techniques. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature in PubMed, searching publications describing the use of natural extracts as antibiotics over bacteria. The exclusion criteria consisted of limiting papers on natural extracts tested over the bacteria culture related to eleven selected bacteria, according to an alert issued by WHO in 2017, and seven plant extracts. Results: All the gram-positive bacteria present in the WHO alert have been treated, with different degrees of advance, with some of the plant extracts and plant-based compounds reviewed. Currently, they are in the preclinical stage. Edible herbs are more often used, as well as artemisia and wine byproducts. Discussion: Natural products based on plants have shown to be efficient in inhibiting bacterial growth, even in antibiotic-resistant strains. The classical extraction methods are still in use and have been improved with the available technology to improve efficiency and yield. Conclusions: Ongoing evidence shows that plant extracts and plant-based compounds are effective as antibacterial, with minimal effects on the host cell, a promising antibiotic source. Furthermore, they are sustainable, environmentally friendly, and renewable.

Background: Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) constitute an important group of infections with serious implications for public health. According to WHO, 1 million new contagions are produced daily, with more than 370 million new cases yearly. STIs can be originated from viruses, bacteria, fungi, or parasites. Regardless of their nature, they can be either cured or treated and controlled, but more importantly, they are preventable. Aims: The best tool to fight against STIs is prevention, which has a strong dependence on knowledge. This work aimed to assess the level of knowledge of society about STIs and gonorrhea. Methods: We conducted an online survey, covering a wide range of ages and levels of education, inquiring about areas such as origin, ways of contagion, prevention, associated diseases, and treatment of STIs and gonorrhea. We performed a statistical analysis of the answers. Results and Discussion: it was found that the general level of knowledge about STIs was independent of the age and level of education of the respondents. The respondent has shown better familiarity with prevention and contagion than with origin, diseases, and treatment. When the question was focused on gonorrhea, we found a lack in the cognizance of several points. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we conclude it is necessary to improve sexual education programs, starting at early ages but directed to all populations, particularly about gonorrhea.