The objective was to evaluate the clinical performance of a therapeutic sealant to arrest the progression of noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions. The study population comprised 50 adolescents in whom bitewing radiographs had been taken for diagnosis of caries. Approximal noncavitated lesions in premolars and molars (4d-7m) were selected. One group (n=17) had a sealant placed after tooth separation on all enamel lesions. A second group (n=7) received sealant and fluoride varnish in a split-mouth design. A control group (n=26) received a standard fluoride varnish treatment without tooth separation. Follow-up radiographs were taken after 2 years and were analyzed together with the baseline radiographs in a blind study setting. About 93% of the sealed initial carious lesions showed no progression. The corresponding value for the fluoride varnish control group was 88%. In the split-mouth study, 92 and 88% of the surfaces with enamel caries showed no progression after sealant or fluoride varnish treatment, respectively. The difference between the two treatment procedures was not statistically significant. The incidence rate for the transition from enamel caries to dentin caries or fillings was 3.5-3.9 surfaces/100 years in the sealant groups and 5.9-6.1 surfaces/100 years in the fluoride varnish groups. The results show the potential of sealants to act as a noninvasive treatment of early approximal enamel lesions.

Objective: The aim of this split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of proximal sealing for avoiding the development of new caries lesions or arresting incipient caries lesions on the mesial surface of first permanent molars (6m) abutting lesions on the distal surface of second primary molars (05d) in children at high caries risk. Methods: A total of 61 children 8-10 years old were selected based on the caries status of the proximal sites of 05d and 6m. Children with caries on 05d and caries-free 6m were placed in the preventive sealing group and children with caries on both 05d and 6m in the therapeutic group. The children in each group had one 6m surface pair and in each pair one 6m surface was randomly allocated to receive a preventive or therapeutic sealing. Using a split-mouth design, the other 6m surface in the pair served as control. Results: After 3.5 years, standardized follow-up radiographs were obtained for the 45 children who remained. In the preventive sealing group, 4 out of 30 (13.3%) sealed and 16 out of 30 (53.3%) unsealed sound 6m surfaces had developed new caries lesions (p = 0.004, McNemar test). In the therapeutic sealing group, the progression of the carious lesions on 6m was observed in 3 out of 15 sealed (20.0%) and 8 out of 15 (53.3%) unsealed caries control surfaces (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Preventive sealing on sound 6m surfaces abutting 05d lesions in children at high caries risk efficaciously prevents the development of caries lesions. Therapeutically sealing active non-cavitated caries lesions reduces the progression.

No abstract

No abstract