Executive deficits characterize the initial phases of Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and are clinically correlated to neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional loss. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome test (BADS) for comparing the performance between patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and mild AD and for detecting early signs of alterations in executive functions. BADS was performed on 60 healthy controls, 20 patients with aMCI, and 40 mild probable AD patients (20 early-onset AD patients and 20 late-onset AD patients). Significant differences in battery performance were found among groups on the BADS subtests Rule Shift Cards, Program of Action, Zoo Map, 6 Modified Elements, and 3 total scores. Early changes in executive functions were detected in both AD (irrespective of age of onset) and aMCI patients. The BADS proved useful for differentiating between these patient groups. Our results confirmed the presence of early alterations in executive functions among aMCI and mild AD patients.
Executive deficits as well as deficits in episodic memory characterize the
initial phases of Alzheimer Disease (AD) and are clinically correlated to
neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional loss. Patients with Mild Cognitive
Impairment present more problems as to inhibitory response control, switching
and cognitive flexibility.ObjectiveTo compare performance on the BADS with performance on other executive
functional tests among patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease, Amnestic Mild
Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) to performance of control individuals and to
examine discriminative capacity of BADS among these groups.MethodsThe BADS was performed by 35 healthy controls, 13 patients with aMCI, and 16
mild probable AD patients. Besides performing the BADS, subjects underwent
neuropsychological evaluation which comprised: the Dementia Rating Scale
(DRS), verbal fluency by phonemic categories (F.A.S) and Concentrated
Attention Test (CA).ResultsThere were no differences among groups by educational level, but performance
differed for age (p<0.01). No difference between healthy controls and
aMCI patients was found on total scores or subitems of the BADS. A
significant difference was observed between aMCI and AD patients (p<0.05)
and between controls and AD patients (p<0.05) on total and standard
scores.ConclusionsPerformance on the BADS differed between healthy individuals and mild AD
patients. The BADS proved to be a sensitive method for discriminating AD
from aMCI.
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) can be an intermediate state between normality
and dementia in some patients. An early diagnosis, through neuropsychological
assessment, could identify individuals at risk of developing dementia.ObjectiveTo verify differences in performance on neuropsychological tests among
controls, amnestic MCI (aMCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients.MethodsSixty-eight AD patients (mean age 73.77±7.24; mean schooling
9.04±4.83; 40 women and 28 men), 34 aMCI patients (mean age
74.44±7.05; mean schooling 12.35±4.01; 20 women) and 60
controls (mean age 68.90±7.48; mean schooling 10.72±4.74; 42
women) were submitted to a neuropsychological assessment composed of tasks
assessing executive functions, language, constructive abilities, reasoning
and memory.ResultsThere were statistically significant differences in performance across all
tests among control, aMCI and AD groups, and also between only controls and
AD patients. On comparing control and aMCI groups, we found statistically
significant differences in memory tasks, except for immediate recall of
Visual Reproduction. There were also statistically significant differences
between aMCI and AD groups on tasks of constructive and visuoperceptual
abilities, attention, language and memory, except for delayed recall of
Visual Reproduction.ConclusionsNeuropsychological assessment was able to discriminate aMCI from AD patients
in almost all tests except for delayed recall of Visual Reproduction, visual
organization (Hooper) and executive functions (WCST); and discriminate
controls from AD patients in all tests, and controls from aMCI patients in
all memory tests except for immediate recall of Visual Reproduction.
The three words-three shapes test is a brief bedside technique for assessment of
learning and memory using verbal and non-verbal material. To the best of our
knowledge, performance of Brazilian elderly on this test has not yet been
reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of normal Brazilian elderly on the three
words-three shapes test.MethodA total of 50 adult patients, 25 males and 25 females, with age ranging from
55 to 81 years (66.0±7.10 years), 1 to 8 years of schooling,
different economic conditions and living in the São José do
Rio Preto municipality, State of São Paulo, were evaluated.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between performance of
males and females. Performance on incidental recall was significantly lower
than in delayed recall. The performance in the learning phase improved
following at least two further presentations of the stimuli. Approximately
50% of the participants did not remember the six stimuli and had to proceed
to the recognition stage. The performance in the recognition stage was
significantly better than during spontaneous recall. Patients with low
educational level (less years of schooling) had poorer performance on the
recall of shapes and on the total score of the test.ConclusionsThe three words-three shapes test is rapid, efficient and straightforward to
apply in the elderly, but low educational level was associated with poorer
performance on this test. Normal elderly individuals had greater difficulty
in the encoding process and in searching for stored information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.