KRAS and NRAS mutations are usually present in the majority of neoplastic cells, whereas BRAF and PIK3CA mutations often affect a limited fraction of transformed cells. Resistance to cetuximab in low-KRAS patients might be driven by the complex mutational profile rather than KRAS mutation load.

Recent findings suggest that a fraction of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) carry additional driver mutations that could potentially affect the activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We investigated the role of concomitant KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, MET and ERBB2 mutations (other mutations) on the outcome of 133 EGFR mutant patients, who received first-line therapy with EGFR TKIs between June 2008 and December 2014. Analysis of genomic DNA by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) revealed the presence of hotspot mutations in genes other than the EGFR, including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, PIK3CA, or MET, in 29/133 cases (21.8%). A p.T790M mutation was found in 9/133 tumour samples (6.8%). The progression free survival (PFS) of patients without other mutations was 11.3 months vs. 7 months in patients with other mutations (log-rank test univariate: p = 0.047). In a multivariate Cox regression model including the presence of other mutations, age, performance status, smoking status, and the presence of p.T790M mutations, the presence of other mutations was the only factor significantly associated with PFS (Hazard Ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.04–2.58; p = 0.035). In contrast, no correlation was found between TP53 mutations and patients’ outcome. These data suggest that a subgroup of EGFR mutant tumours have concomitant driver mutations that might affect the activity of first-line EGFR TKIs.

The introduction in the clinic of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IOs) has represented an important improvement for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These drugs have shown a higher activity as compared with chemotherapy in both first-and second-line of treatment, with some patients experiencing a long-lasting response. More recently, combinations of IOs have entered clinical trials in different tumor types including NSCLC. Nevertheless, IOs are active only in a subgroup of patients and biomarkers for appropriate patients' selection are urgently needed to offer the patients an effective therapy, and also to manage the costs. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) has powerfully emerged as a potential biomarker for immunotherapy and might enter the clinic in the next months, although different challenges are still unsolved. Different methods exist to evaluate TMB in tissue, ranging from whole exome sequencing (WES) to targeted sequencing of smaller sets of genes, which need to be fully standardized to ensure that patients receive an appropriate TMB test with clear clinical interpretation. In addition, as already happened for the implementation of liquid biopsy testing from NSCLC patients to identify targetable alterations, researchers are also evaluating the possibility to calculate TMB in blood, to further enlarge the number of NSCLC patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. Preliminary data highlight the difficulty to develop targeted sequencing panels for the assessment of TMB starting from the circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA). The applicability of TMB testing on liquid biopsy needs further investigation and may be clarified within the ongoing clinical trials.

No abstract