No abstract

To be able to extend the operation of a solar power plant (CSP) up to 15 hours, thermal energy storage (TES) is necessary. But TES also provides more versatility to the plant and makes its reliance during operation hours more dependable. On the other hand, due to the different CSP configurations, a broad spectrum of storage technologies, materials and methods are needed. Sensible and latent heat storage are known technologies in CSP, but thermochemical storage (TCS) is still very much at laboratory level. Nevertheless, TCS has de advantage of nearly no losses during storage and very good volumetric energy density. This review summarizes and compares the different TCS that are today being investigated. Those systems are based in three redox reactions, sulfur-based cycles, metal oxide reduction-oxidation cycles, and perovskitetype hydrogen production, and metal oxide non-redox cycles due to their similarity. This review shows that all these cycles are promising, but none of them seems to have all the characteristics necessary to become the only one storage system for CSP. The main conclusion of the review is that the calcium carbonate is the cycle with most experimentation behind it to infer that it could be viable and should thus be attempted at a research plant scale once a reactivation cycle can be designed; and the manganese oxide cycle, while less developed, is fundamental enough to be a suitable application for desert climates over the rest of the water-frugal or even water-avoiding cycles.

Concentrated solar power (CSP) is today recognized as a unique renewable energy for electricity generation due to its capability to provide dispachable electricity incorporating thermal energy storage (TES). Molten salts TES is the most widespread technology in commercial CSP but the industry is looking for cheaper and more efficient TES systems and phase change materials (PCM) have been highlighted as potential low cost and high energy TES systems. This paper presents a completely new concept of PCM energy storage systems to be used in solar thermal electricity plants with its technical assessment. A cascade type PCM storage system is evaluated, using four buckets with the PCM organized based on melting temperature and the latent energy of the materials. Daily, monthly, and annual transient simulations of the plant performance are carried out. The main conclusion is the similarity between this new concept and the commercial two-tank indirect molten salt system. The cumulative power production over the year is similar and the net production of both systems is well matched.

The aim of this study is to perform a review of the state-of-the-art of the reactors available in the literature, which are used for solid–gas reactions or thermal decomposition processes around 1000 °C that could be further implemented for thermochemical energy storage in CSP (concentrated solar power) plants, specifically for SPT (solar power tower) technology. Both direct and indirect systems can be implemented, with direct and closed systems being the most studied ones. Among direct and closed systems, the most used configuration is the stacked bed reactor, with the fixed bed reactor being the most frequent option. Out of all of the reactors studied, almost 70% are used for solid–gas chemical reactions. Few data are available regarding solar efficiency in most of the processes, and the available information indicates relatively low values. Chemical reaction efficiencies show better values, especially in the case of a fluidized bed reactor for solid–gas chemical reactions, and fixed bed and rotary reactors for thermal decompositions.

a b s t r a c tThermal energy storage (TES) is recognised as a key technology for further deployment of renewable energy and to increase energy efficiency in our systems. Several technology roadmaps include this technology in their portfolio to achieve such objectives. In this paper, a first attempt to collect, organise and classify key performance indicators (KPI) used for TES is presented. Up to now, only KPI for TES in solar power plants (CSP) and in buildings can be found. The listed KPI are quantified in the literature and compared in this paper. This paper shows that TES can only be implemented by policy makers if more KPI are identified for more applications. Moreover, close monitoring of the achievements of the already identified KPI needs to be carried out to demonstrate the potential of TES.