Replacement of the olefin in the complexes
[{Rh(μ-RPz)(C2H4)2}2]
(RPz = pyrazolate (Pz)
(1), 3-methylpyrazolate (MePz) (2),
3,5-dimethylpyrazolate (Me2Pz) (3)) by
tert-butyl isocyanide gives
[{Rh(μ-RPz)(CNBut)2}2]
(4, 5, 6) respectively. Complex
4 can alternatively be
prepared from [{Rh(μ-Pz)(cod)}2] (cod =
1,5-cyclooctadiene) (7) leading to a chemical
equilibrium between 4, 7, and the intermediate
[(cod)Rh(μ-Pz)2Rh(CNBut)2]
(8), which has
been also isolated. Kinetic studies on this apparent ligand
redistribution reaction, leading
to 8, show that it follows a second order rate, giving the
activation parameters ΔH
≠ =
21.8
kcal·mol-1, ΔS≠ =
−7.4 eu, and ΔG
≠298 = 24.0
kcal·mol-1, suggesting that the
dinuclear
complexes are the active species, and no fragmentation seems to occur.
The molecular
structures of complexes 3, 4, 8, and
[{Rh(μ-Pz)(CO)2}2]
(9) determined by X-ray diffraction
show discrete dinuclear complexes with the six-membered
“Rh(μ-Pz)2Rh” ring showing a
boatlike conformation. Complexes 3 and 4
present the shortest and the largest intermetallic
nonbonding separations, 3.0961(2) and 3.8995(6) Å,
respectively, so far reported in di-μ-pyrazolato-dirhodium(I) complexes. In addition, complex
3 shows the shortest olefinic CC
distance found in ethylene rhodium complexes and accordingly a very low
activation energy,
10.0 kcal·mol-1, for the rotation of
the ethylene ligands. Complex 8 undergoes
two
independent intramolecular fluxional processes associated to the ring
inversion of the six-membered “Rh(μ-Pz)2Rh” metallacycle and to a
σ-1,2-metallotropic shift showing activation
parameters ΔH
≠ = 15.0
kcal·mol-1,
ΔS
≠ = −1.7 eu and
ΔH
≠ = 19.7
kcal·mol-1,
ΔS
≠ = 4.8
eu, respectively. The first movement is influenced by medium
effects and may be restricted
by the ancillary ligands and the substituents on the pyrazolate rings
in other bis(μ-pyrazolato)
complexes. Finally, the intermetallic distance in dinuclear
pyrazolato complexes is analyzed
in terms of steric and electronic factors.