This study adds valuable information about relationships of sociodemographic factors and effort-reward imbalance and their impact on dimensions of burnout, particularly on emotional exhaustion.
Purpose: This study aims to explore the associations among psychological distress, perceived social support, and family satisfaction among family members of non-COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design:A cross-sectional study.
Methods: Family members of patients with at least 48 h in the ICU and without a COVID-19 diagnosis were screened between January and March 2021. For enrolled ICU family members, five questionnaires for perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), anxiety symptoms (General Anxiety Disorder-7), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), perceived social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey), and family satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit-24) were administered by phone either in English or Spanish language. Sociodemographic and patient clinical data were also collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact tests. Findings: Of 87 eligible ICU family members, 63 were enrolled (72.4%); 27% of the sample presented with clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, 25.4% with depression, and 76.2% had a high perception of social support. ICU family members with low/fair perceived social support reported statistically significantly higher perceived stress and lower family satisfaction. Perceived stress was negatively correlated with family satisfaction. Clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression were not statistically associated with family satisfaction or perceived social support. Conclusions: While ICU admission-related stress may undermine family satisfaction, perceived social support may be positively associated with the way that ICU family members of non-COVID-19 patients evaluate the quality of care in the ICU. Knowing the factors that influence family satisfaction in the ICU may assist stakeholders and policy developers to improve family-centered care in the hospital setting. Clinical Relevance: Early screening for psychological distress and social support levels during admission should be included in updates of visiting and communication policies in the ICU. Prompt identification of family members at risk of a poor ICU experience may enhance efforts to support them, particularly in acute care settings where
Objective:To evaluate the impact of the implementation of insertion and maintenance bundles
on the rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection in an intensive care unit.
Method:This is a quasi-experimental, before-and-after study with a non-equivalent control
group. During a six-month period, insertion and maintenance bundles for the
central venous catheters were implemented. Supervision guidelines were developed
to assess compliance with the bundle and catheter characteristics. Results:A total of 444 central catheters corresponding to 390 patients were observed, of
which 68.7% were inserted in the unit. The maintenance and insertion bundles
reached 62.9% and 94.7% compliance, respectively, and 50.7% of the insertions were
supervised. It was possible to observe a 54.5% decrease in the rate of central
catheter infection (3.48 vs 1.52 x 1000 days/catheter, p<0.05) when compared
with the control group. Conclusion:The simultaneous implementation of insertion and maintenance bundles has a
positive impact on the reduction of catheter-related bloodstream infection;
therefore it is an efficient alternative to improve the quality and safety of care
in high complexity units.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.