No abstract

No abstract

We hypothesized that clinical process improvement strategies can reduce frequency of motion artifacts and expiratory phase scanning in chest CT. We reviewed 826 chest CT to establish the baseline frequency. Per clinical process improvement guidelines, we brainstormed corrective measures and priority-pay-off matrix. The first intervention involved education of CT technologists, following which 795 chest CT were reviewed. For the second intervention, instructional videos on optimal breath-hold were shown to 245 adult patients just before their chest CT. Presence of motion artifacts and expiratory phase scanning was assessed. We also reviewed 311 chest CT scans belonging to a control group of patients who did not see the instructional videos. Pareto and percentage run charts were created for baseline and post-intervention data. Baseline incidence of motion artifacts and expiratory phase scanning in chest CT was 35% (292/826). There was no change in the corresponding incidence following the first intervention (36%; 283/795). Respiratory motion and expiratory phase chest CT with the second intervention decreased (8%, 20/245 patients). Instructional videos for patients (and not education and training of CT technologists) reduce the frequency of motion artifacts and expiratory phase scanning in chest CT.

The aim of the study was to compare a pediatric ultralow-dose pectus excavatum computed tomography (CT) protocol versus standarddose pediatric thoracic CT in terms of radiation dose, subjective and objective image quality, and its ability to detect incidental nonosseous thoracic pathology compared with imaging and clinical reference.Methods: A single institution radiology database identified a total of 104 ultralow-dose pediatric thoracic CT cases with an equal number of agematched standard-dose chest CT cases also selected for retrospective analysis. Objective image quality (contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios) and radiation dose were assessed. Qualitative Likert scorings of the bone, lung, and soft tissues were performed by 2 expert radiologists. Electronic health records of the ultralow-dose cohort were reviewed for at least 1 year to evaluate for potentially missed thoracic pathology and symptoms. Variables were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests in R software 4.0.5. Results:The ultralow-dose protocol group had statistically significant reductions ( P < 0.001) in the volume CT dose index (0.31 ± 0.19 vs 2.20 ± 1.64 mGy), effective radiation dose (0.14 ± 0.08 vs 1.07 ± 0.86 mSv), and size-specific dose estimates (0.50 ± 0.30 vs 3.43 ± 2.56 mGy) compared with the standard protocol, yielding an 86.51% and 85.32% reduction, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (20.49 ± 6.19 vs 36.48 ± 10.20), contrast-to-noise (21.65 ± 6.57 vs 38.47 ± 10.59), and subjective measures of image quality (lung parenchyma [3.07 ± 0.92 vs 4.42 ± 0.47], bony structures [3.30 ± 0.86 vs 4.52 ± 0.51], and surrounding soft tissues [2.57 ± 0.63 vs 3.89 ± 0.65]) were also significantly lower in the ultralow-dose protocol ( P < 0.001). No differences were seen in the number and size of pulmonary nodules between groups. Clinical and imaging follow of all 104 patients undergoing ultralow-dose CT demonstrated no evidence of missed thoracic pathology causing symptoms.Conclusions: Ultralow-dose thoracic CT is an acceptable modality for imaging pediatric patients with pectus excavatum and other conditions primarily causing osseous pathology, with effective radiation dose comparable to plain radiographs and a moderate increase in image noise that did not significantly reduce its ability to detect incidental nonosseous thoracic pathology.