At our institution, 17% of cervical conization specimens are reported as negative for dysplasia or malignancy. To identify sources of error, we reviewed 53 negative conization specimens and their prior and follow-up cytology, biopsy, and endocervical curettage specimens. Examination of deeper-level sections and p16 immunostaining were performed on all conization specimens and selected biopsy specimens. Dysplasia was detected in 26% (14/53) of conization specimens. Twenty-eight percent (15/53) of cones were truly negative, and the presurgical material had been overcalled as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Forty-five percent (24/53) of cones were truly negative and HSIL was confirmed in the presurgical material. Of these, 11% (6/53) showed subsequent evidence of residual dysplasia and 26% (14/53) were negative on further follow-up. Deeper-level sections, p16 immunostains, and consensus review may help identify squamous dysplasia in conization specimens and may prevent the overdiagnosis of HSIL on cervical biopsies.
The histologic and/or cytologic follow-up of 127 cases of cervical lesions termed "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" (SIL) on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears by the 2001 Bethesda System was compared with 150 control cases of low-grade SIL (LSIL), high-grade SIL (HSIL), and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H). A follow-up diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher was identified in 22.8% of SIL cases, which was 2.6 times higher than LSIL, 3 times lower than HSIL, and 1.5 times lower than ASC-H. A follow-up diagnosis of CIN 1 was identified in 31.5% of SIL cases, which was 2 times lower than the LSIL group, 1.5 times higher than the ASC-H cases, and 1.8 times higher than the HSIL group. We found that 22.0% of cases diagnosed as SIL were followed up by Pap smears rather than colposcopy and biopsy, compared with about 1% of LSIL and HSIL cases. Because SIL cases have a significant risk of harboring CIN 2 or greater, we recommend follow-up by colposcopy and biopsy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.