Three model reference adaptive controllers (MRAC) with varying levels of complexity were evaluated on a high performance jet aircraft and compared along with a baseline nonlinear dynamic inversion controller. The handling qualities and performance of the controllers were examined during failure conditions that induce coupling between the pitch and roll axes. Results from flight tests showed with a roll to pitch input coupling failure, the handling qualities went from Level 2 with the baseline controller to Level 1 with the most complex MRAC tested. A failure scenario with the left stabilator frozen also showed improvement with the MRAC. Improvement in performance and handling qualities was generally seen as complexity was incrementally added; however, added complexity usually corresponds to increased verification and validation effort required for certification. The tradeoff between complexity and performance is thus important to a controls system designer when implementing an adaptive controller on an aircraft. This paper investigates this relation through flight testing of several controllers of vary complexity.

No abstract

A paradigm shift in rotorcraft design is being led by the prospect of propulsive forces being distributed across multiple rotors, such that each rotor can be directly driven by a dedicated electric motor. Crucially, some designers attempt to utilize these direct-drive mechanisms as the sole form of primary flight control. The feasibility of this design choice remains to be proven at the scales required for passenger transport. The paper presents a preliminary handling qualities analysis, for a six-passenger (1,200 lb payload) electric Hexacopter conceptual design, which shows that Level 1 handling qualities for limited agility operations are possible, provided that electric powertrains can deliver transient peak torques twice as high as the rated continuous torque of the conceptual design. Preliminary predictions are then substantiated by the results from a piloted handling qualities evaluation conducted in the NASA-Ames Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS). Three eVTOL configurations (a quadrotor, a hexacopter and a lift+cruise) with flight control laws implementing different levels of stability augmentation (Attitude Command-Attitude Hold and Translational Rate Command response types) were evaluated in four low speed and hover tasks requiring various levels of agility and precision.

No abstract