PURPOSE Sixty percent of newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) receiving frontline therapy attain a complete response (CR), yet 30%-40% of patients relapse. Relapsed or refractory AML (R/R-AML) remains a particularly adverse population necessitating improved therapeutic options. This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin combined with the B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax in ND-AML and R/R-AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS The phase IB portion (PIB) enrolled patients with R/R-AML using a 3 + 3 dose escalation and de-escalation algorithm for identification of maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities. The phase II portion enrolled patients into two arms to evaluate response and time-to-event end points: phase IIA (PIIA): ND-AML and phase IIB (PIIB): R/R-AML. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients have enrolled to date (PIB, 16; PIIA, 29; PIIB, 23). Median age was 46 years (range, 20-73). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurring in ≥ 10% of patients included febrile neutropenia (50%), bacteremia (35%), pneumonia (28%), and sepsis (12%). The overall response rate for PIB, PIIA, and PIIB was 75%, 97%, and 70% with 75%, 90%, and 61%, respectively, achieving a composite CR. Measurable residual disease–negative composite CR was attained in 96% of ND-AML and 69% of R/R-AML patients. After a median follow-up of 12 months, median overall survival (OS) for both PII cohorts was not reached. Fifty-six percent of patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ND-AML, 69%; R/R-AML, 46%). In R/R-AML, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation resulted in a significant improvement in OS (median OS, NR; 1-year OS, 87%). One-year survival post-HSCT was 94% in ND-AML and 78% in R/R-AML. CONCLUSION Fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin + venetoclax represents an effective intensive treatment regimen in ND-AML and R/R-AML patients, associated with deep remissions and a high rate of transition to successful transplantation.

Nucleophosmin-1 mutations (NPM1+) occur in ∼30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Although typically associated with favorable prognosis, the beneficial impact of NPM1+ decreases with increasing age in patients treated with standard intensive chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs). This retrospective analysis compared outcomes of NPM1+ AML patients treated with 1 of 3 induction approaches: HMA plus BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN), HMA, or IC therapy. Composite complete response (CRc: CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) was seen in 96% (27/28), 36% (17/47), and 89% (204/228) of HMA + VEN, HMA, and IC patients, respectively (HMA + VEN vs HMA, P < .001; HMA + VEN vs IC, P = .10). Older patients (age >65 years) treated with HMA + VEN, HMA, or IC had CR rates of 88%, 28%, and 56%, respectively (HMA + VEN vs HMA, P < .001; HMA + VEN vs IC, P = .01). Significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was seen in patients age >65 years treated with HMA + VEN vs HMA (not reached [NR] vs 0.4 years; P < .001) or IC (NR vs 0.93 years; P = .001). Older patients treated with HMA + VEN had OS of 80% after median 1-year follow-up, with estimated 2-year OS of 70%. In the multivariable Cox model analysis, HMA + VEN was associated with a 69% lower risk of death compared with IC (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.83; type I error–adjusted P = .038). HMA + VEN combinations demonstrated impressive results compared with traditional standard-of-care regimens in older patients with NPM1+ AML.

7012 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 ( IDH1+) mutations are present in 5-15% of myeloid malignancies, promoting leukemogenesis through production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate resulting in arrested myeloid differentiation. IDH1+ malignancies demonstrate increased reliance on the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2, enhancing susceptibility to the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN). We report an interim safety and efficacy analysis of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (IVO; 500 mg PO daily D15-continuous) combined with VEN (D1-14) +/- azacitidine (AZA; 75mg/m2 D1-7 every 28 days). Methods: Eligible patients age ≥18 with IDH1+ MDS, newly diagnosed AML (ND: treatment naïve [TN] or secondary/treated secondary AML [sAML]), or relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML enrolled into three dose levels (DL): DL1 (IVO+VEN 400 mg), DL2 (IVO+VEN 800 mg), DL3 (IVO+VEN 400 mg+AZA). Primary objectives included safety and tolerability, and IWG defined overall response (ORR: CR+CRi+CRh+PR+MLFS). Prior receipt of IVO or VEN was exclusionary. Results: 25 evaluable patients (DL1: 6, DL2: 6, DL3: 13) enrolled with a median follow-up of 16.1 months. Median age was 67 (range: 44-84). 84% (N=21) of patients had AML (ND: N=13 [TN: 8, sAML: 5], R/R: N=8), while 16% (N=4) had MDS. ELN risk was intermediate and adverse in 16% (N=4) and 56% (N=14). Median IDH1 VAF at enrollment was 22.7% (range: 5.1%-47.8%). Two patients had received a prior IDH1 inhibitor. The ORR was 92% (DL1: 67%, DL2: 100%, DL3: 100%). Composite CR (CRc: CR+CRi+CRh) was 84% (DL1: 67%, DL2: 100%, DL3: 85%) including 92% (TN: 100%, sAML: 80%), 63%, and 100% of patients with ND-AML, R/R-AML, or MDS. Median number of cycles received was 4 (DL1: 8.5, DL2: 6, DL3: 4) with ongoing responses in 62% (DL1: 33%, DL2: 50%, DL3: 82%) at 1-year. 8 patients transitioned to SCT (DL1: 0, DL2: 2, DL3: 6), and 8 patients remain on study (DL1: 2, DL2: 1, DL3: 5). 1-year OS was 68% for the entire study population (DL1: 50%, DL2: 67%, DL3: 78%), 71% in ND-AML (TN: 86%, sAML: 60%), 50% in R/R-AML, and 100% in MDS. Measurable residual disease negative CRc by multiparameter flow cytometry was attained in 60% (ND-AML: 67%, R/R-AML: 60%, MDS: 33%) correlating with improved OS (median OS: NR vs. 8.5 months, p-value: 0.038). Common grade 3/4 adverse events included febrile neutropenia (28%) and pneumonia (24%). Tumor lysis and differentiation syndrome occurred in two and four patients; all cases resolved with medical management. Conclusions: IVO+VEN +/- AZA is an effective treatment regimen in patients with IDH1+myeloid malignancies. The combination therapy is associated with an acceptable and expected toxicity profile with notable efficacy and high rates of MRD-negative CRc in AML. Enrollment into the study continues. Clinical trial information: NCT03471260. [Table: see text]

7500 Background: Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 gene ( IDH1) result in myeloid differentiation arrest and accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), promoting leukemogenesis. We report a primary safety and efficacy analysis of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (IVO; 500 mg PO daily D15-continous) combined with venetoclax (VEN; D1-14 per 28-day cycle), with and without azacitidine (AZA; 75mg/m2 D1-7). Methods: Eligible patients age ≥18 with IDH1 mutated myeloid malignancies (high-risk MDS and AML) enrolled into one of three successive cohorts (Cohort 1: IVO+VEN 400 mg, Cohort 2: IVO+VEN 800 mg, Cohort 3: IVO+VEN 400 mg+AZA). Primary endpoints include safety and tolerability and overall response rate (ORR) by revised IWG criteria. Key secondary endpoints include survival endpoints and PK correlates. Results: 19 patients (median age 68) enrolled, 17 with AML: 9 relapsed/refractory AML (R/R; median 1 prior line of therapy), 5 treatment naïve AML, and 3 HMA-failure MDS with secondary AML. Two patients had high-risk MDS. ELN risk was favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk in 37%, 15%, and 47%. Co-mutations included NPM1 (37%), chromatin-spliceosome (32%), methylation (16%), and RAS pathway (21%). Adverse events of special interest included IDH differentiation syndrome (n=4, grade > 3 in 1) and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS; n=2), including one grade 3 TLS event in a NPM1+ patient (successfully managed without hemodialysis). In evaluable patients (n=18), composite complete remission (CRc: CR+CRi+CRh) rates were 78% overall (treatment naive: 100%, R/R: 75%), and 67%, 100%, and 67% by cohort (median time to best response: 2 months). 7 (50%) patients achieving CRc were also MRD negative by flow cytometry. 1 patient had HI without CR/CRi and 1 had a MLFS. 9 (50%) patients remain on study, 3 (17%) proceeded to SCT in CR, 2 were non-responders, and 5 (22%) experienced progressive disease following CRc occurring after a median of 3 months. After a median follow up of 3.5 months, median OS was not reached in treatment naïve patients, and 9.7 months in R/R patients. Conclusions: IVO+VEN +AZA therapy is well tolerated and highly effective for patients with IDH1 mutated AML. Follow up and accrual is ongoing to better define duration and biomarkers of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03471260 . [Table: see text]

No abstract