Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the effects of a 6-week progressive resistance tongue exercise protocol in mental practice form on tongue strength. Investigation begins in typically aging adults, a population susceptible to reduced tongue strength and dysphagia secondary to age-related changes in the swallowing mechanism. It was hypothesized that typically aging adults who perform a 6-week progressive resistance tongue exercise protocol in mental practice form would increase tongue strength. Method A prospective, case series intervention study was used. Six healthy women aged 53–78 years completed a 6-week mental practice tongue resistance exercise program utilizing motor imagery to imagine completion of tongue exercises. The main outcome was mean isometric maximum tongue pressures (tongue strength), which were collected at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 6 using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument ( IOPI Medical, 2013 ). Results By Week 6 of the study, all participants had significantly increased their tongue strength compared to baseline. Conclusions The findings indicate that mental practice using motor imagery for tongue exercise may improve tongue strength in healthy individuals at risk for dysphagia and may thus represent a promising direction warranting further investigation in typically aging individuals and patients with dysphagia and decreased tongue strength.

The need for convenient, cost-effective, and applicable training and education is paramount. Opportunities for interagency cross training and education, particularly around risk assessment, psychosocial adjustment symptoms, and the biomechanical causes of psychiatric symptoms may alleviate perceived disconnections, improve provider confidence, and mitigate crises. Developing interprofessional teams of providers to maximize access to services, either face-to-face or virtual, is integral. These perspectives highlight opportunities to improve access to services and to strengthen relationships across providers and agencies.

The challenges of providing optimal healthcare for individuals with brain injuries are heightened by the unique complexity of the injury itself. Survivors with long-term needs often encounter precarious situations where they struggle to receive services in health systems focused on cost containment driven by medical necessity and managed care. This article draws inductively from the rehabilitation experiences of 2 survivors to highlight neuroethical considerations representing the person, the rehabilitation system, and the medical model. Drawing upon our experience studying the provision of care in the Commonwealth of Virginia, we seek to explicate the challenge of providing longitudinal services. Three diverse and intersecting ethical considerations are applied: (1) teleological implications within rehabilitation medicine; (2) a care ethics framework, nested in the scholarship of feminist and disability ethics; and (3) the literature on pragmatism and dehumanization. This article uses these frameworks to explore the challenge posed by current healthcare practices and the needs of individuals with chronic brain injury.

Findings support continuing education as a correlate to self-reported confidence to treat dysphagia in the school setting among SLPs in Virginia and its contiguous states. Further research is merited to ascertain if these findings reflect national trends. Quantifiable, cost-effective, and evidenced-based dysphagia training, consultancy, and management models are needed if school-based SLPs are to meet the increasing challenges of their diverse caseloads.

No abstract