Collectively, reservoirs constitute a significant global source of C-based greenhouse gases (GHGs). Yet, global estimates of reservoir carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions remain uncertain, varying more than four-fold in recent analyses. Here we present results from a global application of the Greenhouse Gas from Reservoirs (G-res) model wherein we estimate perarea and per-reservoir CO2 and CH4 fluxes, by specific flux pathway and in a spatially and temporally explicit manner, as a function of reservoir characteristics. We show: 1) CH4 fluxes via degassing and ebullition are much larger than previously recognized and diffusive CH4 fluxes are lower than previously estimated, while CO2 emissions are similar to those reported in past work; 2) per-area reservoir GHG fluxes are >29% higher than suggested by previous studies, due in large part to our novel inclusion of the degassing flux in our global estimate; 3) CO2 flux is the dominant emissions pathway in boreal regions and CH4 degassing and ebullition are dominant in tropical and subtropical regions, with the highest overall reservoir GHG fluxes in the tropics and subtropics; and 4) reservoir GHG fluxes are quite sensitive to input parameters that are both poorly constrained and likely to be strongly influenced by climate change in coming decades (parameters such as temperature and littoral area, where the latter may be expanded by deepening thermoclines expected to accompany warming surface waters). Together these results highlight a critical need to both better understand climate-related drivers of GHG emission and to better quantify GHG emissions via CH4 ebullition and degassing.
Abstract. Reservoirs are important sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the
atmosphere, and their number is rapidly increasing, especially in tropical
regions. Accurately predicting their current and future emissions is
essential but hindered by fragmented data on the subject, which often fail
to include all emission pathways (surface diffusion, ebullition, degassing,
and downstream emissions) and the high spatial and temporal flux
variability. Here we conducted a comprehensive sampling of Batang Ai
reservoir (Malaysia), and compared field-based versus modelled estimates of
its annual carbon footprint for each emission pathway. Carbon dioxide
(CO2) and methane (CH4) surface diffusion were higher in upstream
reaches. Reducing spatial and temporal sampling resolution resulted in up to a 64 % and 33 % change in the flux estimate, respectively. Most GHGs present in
discharged water were degassed at the turbines, and the remainder were
gradually emitted along the outflow river, leaving time for CH4 to be
partly oxidized to CO2. Overall, the reservoir emitted 2475 gCO2eqm-2yr-1, with 89 % occurring downstream of the dam, mostly in
the form of CH4. These emissions, largely underestimated by
predictions, are mitigated by CH4 oxidation upstream and downstream of
the dam but could have been drastically reduced by slightly raising the
water intake elevation depth. CO2 surface diffusion and CH4
ebullition were lower than predicted, whereas modelled CH4 surface
diffusion was accurate. Investigating latter discrepancies, we conclude that
exploring morphometry, soil type, and stratification patterns as predictors
can improve modelling of reservoir GHG emissions at local and global scales.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.