BackgroundWhile a male infant is usually born with a higher birthweight than his female counterpart, he is more at risk of variety of adverse perinatal outcomes. Indeed, throughout life, females exhibit a marked survival advantage compared to males. The aetiology for such pertinent sex disparity remains unclear and is likely multifactorial.AimsThe aim of this study was to investigate obstetric and perinatal outcomes by infant sex from 28 weeks in a contemporary, large Australian birth cohort.Materials and MethodsA 14‐year retrospective cohort study of 130 133 births over 28 weeks gestation from a single tertiary centre.ResultsMale infants had overall higher rates of neonatal mortality (0.12% vs 0.06%, P < 0.001) and severe neonatal morbidity (12% vs 9.1%, P < 0.001) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.35–1.47). The odds of overall perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal death) were higher for male infants (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08–1.56). The difference in severe neonatal morbidity when stratified by gestational age at birth only remained significant from >35 weeks gestation. Regardless of infant sex, rates of neonatal mortality and morbidity were lowest at 39 weeks gestation. Rates of preterm birth and operative birth were also higher for male infants.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates significant disparities in clinical outcomes by infant sex with males at a disadvantage to female infants.
Both delayed cord clamping (DCC) and cord blood gas (CBG) analysis are recommended practices for preterm births. However, the compliance rates remain lower than expected, with a DCC rate of only 48.9% and CBG sampling of 66.6% in the preterm cohort. DCC was associated with a significant reduction in success rate of paired CBG analysis in both the term and preterm cohort of 8.3% and 7.7% respectively. Our study highlights the difficulty in achieving both recommendations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.