Objective. Mean intracranial pressure (ICP) is commonly used in the management of patients with intracranial pathologies. However, the shape of the ICP signal over a single cardiac cycle, called ICP pulse waveform, also contains information on the state of the craniospinal space. In this study we aimed to propose an end-to-end approach to classification of ICP waveforms and assess its potential clinical applicability. Methods. ICP pulse waveforms obtained from long-term ICP recordings of 50 neurointensive care unit (NICU) patients were manually classified into four classes ranging from normal to pathological. An additional class was introduced to simultaneously identify artifacts. Several deep learning models and data representations were evaluated. An independent testing dataset was used to assess the performance of final models. Occurrence of different waveform types was compared with the patients' clinical outcome. Results. Residual Neural Network using 1-D ICP signal as input was identified as the best performing model with accuracy of 93% in the validation and 82% in the testing dataset. Patients with unfavorable outcome exhibited significantly lower incidence of normal waveforms compared to the favorable outcome group even at ICP levels below 20 mm Hg (median [first-third quartile]: 9 [1-36] % vs. 63 [52-88] %, p=0.002).Conclusions. Results of this study confirm the possibility of analyzing ICP pulse waveform morphology in long-term recordings of NICU patients. Proposed approach could potentially be used to provide additional information on the state of patients with intracranial pathologies beyond mean ICP.
OBJECTIVE Intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse waveform analysis may provide valuable information about cerebrospinal pressure-volume compensation in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The authors applied spectral methods to analyze ICP waveforms in terms of the pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP), high frequency centroid (HFC), and higher harmonics centroid (HHC) and also used a morphological classification approach to assess changes in the shape of ICP pulse waveforms using the pulse shape index (PSI). METHODS The authors included 184 patients from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) High-Resolution Sub-Study in the analysis. HFC was calculated as the average power-weighted frequency within the 4- to 15-Hz frequency range of the ICP power density spectrum. HHC was defined as the center of mass of the ICP pulse waveform harmonics from the 2nd to the 10th. PSI was defined as the weighted sum of artificial intelligence–based ICP pulse class numbers from 1 (normal pulse waveform) to 4 (pathological waveform). RESULTS AMP and PSI increased linearly with mean ICP. HFC increased proportionally to ICP until the upper breakpoint (average ICP of 31 mm Hg), whereas HHC slightly increased with ICP and then decreased significantly when ICP exceeded 25 mm Hg. AMP (p < 0.001), HFC (p = 0.003), and PSI (p < 0.001) were significantly greater in patients who died than in patients who survived. Among those patients with low ICP (< 15 mm Hg), AMP, PSI, and HFC were greater in those with poor outcome than in those with good outcome (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Whereas HFC, AMP, and PSI could be used as predictors of mortality, HHC may potentially serve as an early warning sign of intracranial hypertension. Elevated HFC, AMP, and PSI were associated with poor outcome in TBI patients with low ICP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.