BackgroundThe VX120 (Visionix Luneau, France) is a novel multi-diagnostic platform that combines Hartmann–Shack based autorefraction, Placido-disk based corneal-topography and anterior segment measurements made with a stationary-Scheimpflug camera. We investigate the agreement between different parameters measured by the VX120 with accepted or gold-standard techniques to test if they are interchangeable, as well as to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility.MethodsThe right-eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Autorefraction of the VX120 was compared to subjective refraction. Agreement of anterior segment parameters was compared to the Sirius (CSO, Italy) including autokeratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), iridiocorneal angle (IA). Inter and intra-test repeatability of the above parameters was assessed. Results were analyzed using Bland and Altman analyses.ResultsA total of 164 eyes were evaluated. The mean difference between VX120 autorefraction and subjective refraction for sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), and cylinder was 0.01 ± 0.43 D, 0.14 ± 0.47 D, and −0.26 ± 0.30 D, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r > 0.75) except for J45 (r = 0.61). The mean difference between VX120 and the Sirius system for CCT, IA, and keratometry (k1 and k2) was −3.51 ± 8.64 μm, 7.6 ± 4.2°, 0.003 ± 0.06 mm and 0.004 ± 0.04 mm, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r > 0.97) except for IA (r = 0.67). Intrasession repeatability of VX120 refraction, CCT, IA and keratometry yielded low within-subject standard deviations. Inter-session repeatability showed no statistically significant difference for most of the parameters measured.ConclusionsThe VX120 provides consistent refraction and most anterior segment measurements in normal healthy eyes, with high levels of intra and inter-session repeatability.

No abstract