A method to interpret the magnetic anomaly due to a dipping dike using the resultant of the horizontal and vertical gradients of the anomaly is suggested. The resultant of both the gradients is a vector quantity and is defined as the “complex gradient.” A few characteristic points defined on the amplitude and phase plots of the complex gradient are used to solve for the parameters of the dike. For a dike uniformly magnetized in the earth’s magnetic field, the amplitude plot is independent of [Formula: see text], the index parameter, which depends upon the strike and dip of the dike and the magnetic inclination of the area. The phase plot of the complex gradient is an antisymmetric curve with an offset value equal to [Formula: see text]. For a dike whose half‐width is greater than its depth of burial, two maxima at equal distances on either side of a minimum value appear on the amplitude plot. For a dike whose half‐width is equal to or less than its depth of burial, the amplitude plot is a bell‐shaped symmetric curve with its maximum appearing directly over the origin. In the case of a thin dike, the amplitude function falls off to half its maximum value at the same point on the abscissa where the phase function reaches, i.e., [Formula: see text]. A combined analysis of the amplitude and phase plots of the complex gradient yields all the parameters of the dike. The method is applicable for the magnetic anomaly in either the total, vertical, or horizontal field. A field example is included to show the applicability of the method.

A method for quantitative interpretation of self‐potential anomalies due to a two‐dimensional sheet of finite depth extent is proposed. In the case of an inclined sheet, positions and amplitudes of the maximum, minimum, and zero‐anomaly points are picked and then the origin is located on the horizontal gradient curve using the template of Rao et al (1965). The parameters of the sheet may be evaluated either geometrically or by using some analytical relations among the characteristic distances. When the sheet is vertical, the parameters may be evaluated using the positions of half and three‐quarter peak amplitudes.

No abstract

The inclined sheet is an important model for interpreting self‐potential (SP) anomalies over elongated ore deposits. Many techniques (Roy and Chowdhurry, 1959; Meiser, 1962; Paul, 1965; Atchuta Rao et al., 1982; Atchuta Rao and Ram Babu, 1983; Murty and Haricharan, 1985) have been proposed for interpreting SP anomalies over this model. We propose a simple graphical procedure for locating the upper and lower edges of an inclined sheet of infinite strike extent from its SP anomaly V(x) using a few characteristics points including [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] The amplitude ratio [Formula: see text], is shown to vary with θ, the dip of the sheet, making it possible to estimate θ. The two edges of the sheet are equidistant from the abscissa of [Formula: see text] the zero potential point. The sheet, when extrapolated onto the line of observation, meets the x‐axis at a point where [Formula: see text] From these characteristic features of V(x), the sheet can be located easily using the simple geometrical construction presented below.

Although a great variety of interpretation techniques for basement depth determination has been developed during the past two or three decades, the half‐slope and straight‐slope methods are still popular due to their simplicity and general reliability in manual interpretation and are widely used in oil exploration work (Nettleton, 1976). The half‐slope and straight‐slope rules are derived for a particular set of geologic/geophysical conditions and care should be taken in applying them in a more general way. For example, the half‐slope method of Peters (1949) was derived for magnetic anomalies over vertical dikes with vertical polarization. The straight‐slope method uses the horizontal projection of the straight‐line part of the steepest gradient at the inflection point on the anomaly curve as the depth estimator. This rule is purely empirical because mathematically there is no straightline part on the anomaly curve. Vacquier et al. (1951) made an exhaustive study of the straight‐slope method and presented several depth indices measured on different flanks of anomalies due to prismatic bodies.