Background: Despite the conformity of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment, there are concerns about the risk of malignancy. Objective: We compared the number of cancer cases observed after treatment in a group of SRS patients to the number of cancer cases that would be expected in an age- and gender-matched group. Methods: We collected data from the University of Florida SRS database for patients treated for meningiomas, intracranial schwannomas, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), trigeminal neuralgia, pituitary adenomas, cavernous angiomas, and metastases. We used the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS) to determine the actual cancer rates for SRS-treated patients, and we compared these to the cancer rates in similar groups of non-SRS-treated patients based on rates available from the SEER (surveillance epidemiology and end results) database. Results: A total of 2,369 patients were analyzed. Of these, 862 were patients with metastases who were analyzed only to ensure the sensitivity of using the FCDS to determine malignancy rates. The results for patients with more than 5 years of follow-up are reported. Without the metastases patients, a total of 627 patients had more than 5 years of follow-up data. Follow-up in patient-years was 1,711 for the meningioma patients, 1,851 for the schwannoma patients, 1,407 for the AVM patients and 338 for patients with a diagnosis of ‘other'. The observed cancer rate in the meningioma patients was 3.96% compared to the expected rate of 10% (binomial 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.85-7.94). The observed cancer rate in the schwannoma patients was 4.93% compared to the expected rate of 12.5% (95% CI = 2.61-8.89). The observed cancer rate in the AVM patients was 3.64% compared to the expected rate of 4.43% (95% CI = 1.49-8.10). The observed cancer rate in patients treated for other diagnoses (e.g. pituitary adenoma or trigeminal neuralgia) was 0% compared to the expected rate of 6.36% (95% CI = 0-11.7). Conclusions: In a large population of SRS-treated patients, there was no increased risk of malignancy compared to the general population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.