Catheter coatings have the potential to decrease infection and thrombosis in patients with chronic dialysis catheters. We report our midterm experience with a heparin-coated dialysis catheter. This retrospective, case-control study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. A total of 88 tunneled dialysis catheters were inserted over a 13-month period via the internal jugular vein. Thirty-eight uncoated split-tip catheters and 50 heparin-coated catheters were inserted. Primary catheter patency was compared between the two groups using the log rank test, with infection and/or thrombosis considered as catheter failures. Dialysis parameters during the first and last dialysis sessions, including pump speed, actual blood flow, and arterial port pressures, were compared using unpaired t-tests. Primary patency of the uncoated catheters was 86.0 +/- 6.5% at 30 days and 76.1 +/- 8.9% at 90 days. Primary patency of heparin-coated catheters was 92.0 +/- 6.2% at 30 days and 81.6 +/- 8.0% at 90 days (p = 0.87, log rank test). Infection requiring catheter removal occurred in four patients with uncoated catheters and two patients with heparin-coated catheters (p = 0.23). Catheter thrombosis requiring catheter replacement or thrombolysis occurred in one patient with an uncoated catheter and two patients with heparin-coated catheters (p = 0.9). No differences in catheter function during hemodialysis were seen between the two groups. In conclusion, the heparin-coated catheter did not show a significantly longer patency compared to the uncoated catheter. The flow characteristics of this device were comparable to those of the conventional uncoated catheter. A demonstrable benefit of the heparin-coated catheter in randomized trials is needed before a recommendation for routine implementation can be made.

Objective: To compare the demographic profiles, behavioral risk factors, and preventive health care practices of adult immigrant and non-immigrant patients while considering the effects of various socioeconomic variables. Methods: This was a prospective survey administered at a large urban emergency department in New York City. Study subjects were adult immigrant patients presenting in an eight-week period in 1998. One non-immigrant control patient was recruited concurrently with every two immigrant patients. Differences between immigrants and non-immigrants were evaluated using the chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounding variables. Results: Eight hundred sixty-nine immigrant patients from 80 countries and 354 non-immigrant patients completed surveys. Immigrants were more likely not to have reached high school (28.9% vs 8.5%; p < 0.001), to have annual family incomes less than $20,000 (73.8% vs 64.5%; p < 0.01), and to have no health coverage (51.7% vs 30.8%; p < 0.001). Immigrant women were more likely never to have had a Papanicolaou test (16.1% vs 1.4%; OR 11.24, 95% CI = 2.70 to 46.8) and never to have performed a self-breast examination (20.8% vs 7.5%; OR 2.03, 95% CI = 1.29 to 3.20). Immigrants were more likely not to use condoms (63.4%