The count versus METs relationship for accelerometry was found to be dependent on the type of activity performed, which may be due to the inability of accelerometers to detect increased energy cost from upper body movement, load carriage, or changes in surface or terrain. This may introduce error in attempts to use accelerometry to assess point estimates of physical activity energy expenditure in free-living situations.

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a portable metabolic system (TEEM 100) during submaximal and maximal (VO2max) exercise using a computer-based metabolic system as the reference system (REF). Between repeated trials of submaximal exercise at three constant loads, differences in ventilation (Ve) and oxygen consumption (VO2) were 0.2 +/- 4.9 L . min-1 and 0.03 +/- 0.10 L . min-1 for REF, and 1.9 +/- 0.7 L . min-1 and 0.00 +/- 0.17 L . min-1 for TEEM 100. Pooled intraclass reliability coefficients for Ve and VO2 calculated from the repeated submaximal trials were r = .89 and r = .94 for REF, and r = .86 and r = .94 for the TEEM 100. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) measured by the TEEM 100 was significantly higher (p = .01) at only the lowest workload. At VO2max, the TEEM 100 recorded significantly higher values for FeO2 (p = .01) and RER (p < .001). These results suggest that the TEEM 100 provides reliable and valid measurements of VO2 during submaximal and maximal exercise.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract