Updated international guidelines published in 2006 have broadened the scope for the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in supporting delivery of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. G-CSF prophylaxis is now recommended when the overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) due to regimen and individual patient factors is ≥20%, for supporting dose-dense and dose-intense chemotherapy and to help maintain dose density where dose reductions have been shown to compromise outcomes. Indeed, there is now a large body of evidence for the efficacy of G-CSFs in supporting dose-dense chemotherapy. Predictive tools that can help target those patients who are most at risk of FN are now becoming available. Recent analyses have shown that, by reducing the risk of FN and chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, G-CSF prophylaxis can potentially enhance survival benefits in patients receiving chemotherapy in curative settings. Accumulating data from ‘real-world’ clinical practice settings indicate that patients often receive abbreviated courses of daily G-CSF and consequently obtain a reduced level of FN protection. A single dose of PEGylated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) may provide a more effective, as well as a more convenient, alternative to daily G-CSF. Prospective studies are needed to validate the importance of delivering the full dose intensity of standard chemotherapy regimens, with G-CSF support where appropriate, across a range of settings. These studies should also incorporate prospective evaluation of risk stratification for neutropenia and its complications.

BackgroundNivestim™ (filgrastim) is a follow-on biologic agent licensed in the EU for the treatment of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia induced by myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Nivestim™ has been studied in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials where its efficacy and safety was found to be similar to its reference product, Neupogen®. Follow-on biologics continue to be scrutinised for safety. We present a design for two observational phase IV studies that are evaluating the safety profile of Nivestim™ for the prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy in general clinical practice.Methods/DesignThe NEXT (Tolérance de Nivestim chez les patiEnts traités par une chimiothérapie anticancéreuse cytotoXique en praTique courante) and VENICE (VErträglichkeit von NIvestim unter zytotoxischer Chemotherapie in der Behandlung malinger Erkrankungen) trials are multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, observational studies evaluating the safety profile of Nivestim™ in 'real-world’ clinical practice. Inclusion criteria include patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignancy and receiving Nivestim as primary or secondary prophylaxis (NEXT and VENICE), or as treatment for ongoing FN (NEXT only). In accordance with European Union pharmacovigilance guidelines, the primary objective is to evaluate the safety of Nivestim™ by gathering data on adverse events in all system organ classes. Secondary objectives include obtaining information on patient characteristics, efficacy of Nivestim™ therapy (including chemotherapy dose intensity), patterns of use of Nivestim™, and physician knowledge regarding filgrastim prescription and the reasons for choosing Nivestim™. Data will be gathered at three visits: 1. At the initial inclusion visit, 2. At a 1-month follow-up visit, and 3. At the end of chemotherapy.Recruitment for VENICE commenced in July 2011 and in November 2011 for NEXT. VENICE completed recruitment in July 2013 with 407 patients, and NEXT in September 2013 with 2123 patients. Last patient, last visit for each study will be December 2013 and March 2014 respectively.DiscussionThe NEXT and VENICE studies will provide long-term safety, efficacy and practice pattern data in patients receiving Nivestim™ to support myelosuppressive chemotherapy in real world clinical practice. These data will improve our understanding of the performance of Nivestim™ in patients encountered in the general patient population.Trial registrationNEXT NCT01574235, VENICE NCT01627990

We report the results of a chemotherapy regimen combining oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The objective of this pilot study was to define the potential efficacy of this second-line combination in patients previously treated with interleukin-2 alone or in combination with interferon alpha. Fourteen patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in failure after immunotherapy were included in this trial. During treatment, patients received six chemotherapy courses (Folfox regimen) administered every 2 weeks. Each cycle combined oxaliplatin day (D) D1 and folinic acid plus 5-fluorouracil D1 and D2. At completion of treatment, no objective response was observed and two patients presented stable disease. This chemotherapy schedule in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with immunotherapy does not seem to be effective.

Idarubicin (IDR) is a new analog of Daunorubicin (DNR) selected for clinical trials because of its outstanding activity in experimental leukemias of mice and in several experimental models when compared to DNR and Doxorubicin. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose in adult patients with acute leukemia refractory to prior treatment, using intravenously (I.V.) daily treatments for 5 consecutive days. Eleven patients were entered in this study. The initial dose of IDR was 4 mg/m2/d X 5 I.V. The highest dose given was 8 mg/m2/d X 5 I.V. Dose limiting toxicity were gastrointestinal side effects at the 8 mg/m2/d X 5 level (mucositis-diarrhea). Antileukemic activity has been detected in acute non-lymphoblastic leukemia not pretreated with anthracyclines. For Phase II adult leukemia studies using this schedule, it is recommended that the IDR dose should be 7 mg/m2/d.