This study examines the impact of a preadmission telephone intervention on anxiety, knowledge, and readiness for discharge for patients attending a preadmission teaching program prior to cardiac surgery. The primary goal of the telephone intervention was to provide support by giving additional information about individual concerns. The telephone intervention did not have an effect on anxiety and knowledge. A significantly higher level of anxiety was found in the experimental group on admission, but this difference became nonsignificant when baseline level and length of waiting time were entered as covariates. The more anxious group rated their perceived knowledge level lower, despite the fact that both groups had similar scores in actual knowledge. Given the potential barrier that anxiety can pose for patient learning, nurses need to adapt their interventions to deal with the patients' feelings of anxiety that accompany cardiac surgery to make the learning process effective.
Insulin administration in the acute care setting is an integral component of inpatient diabetes management. Although some institutions have moved to insulin pen devices, many acute care settings continue to employ the vial and syringe method of insulin administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of insulin pen implementation in the acute care setting on patients, healthcare workers and health resource utilization. A review of published literature, including guidelines, was conducted to identify how insulin pen devices in the acute care setting may impact inpatient diabetes management. Previously published studies have revealed that insulin pen devices have the potential to improve inpatient management through better glycemic control, increased adherence and improved self-management education. Furthermore, insulin pen devices may result in cost savings and improved safety for healthcare workers. There are benefits to the use of insulin pen devices in acute care and, as such, their implementation should be considered.
Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the SGLT2is empagliflozin 10mg and 25mg compared to other SGLT2is (canagliflozin 100mg and canagliflozin 300mg) when administered as an add-on to MET+SU in patients with T2DM in the UK. MethOds: Long-term diabetes-related complications, QALYs, and costs were estimated for T2DM patients failing MET+SU. A micro-simulation model was developed based on the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS68) and the Januvia Diabetes Economic (JADE) model. A network meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety across SGLT2is was used to populate the model. Data gaps were completed with information derived from published sources, including previous cost-effectiveness models. Costs and QALYs were estimated over a patients' lifetime from the UK National Health Service perspective. Results: Empagliflozin 10mg attained the highest QALYs (6.991, compared to 6.98 for canagliflozin 100mg, 6.978 for empagliflozin 25mg and 6.976 for canagliflozin 300mg) due to slightly better HbA1c, SBP and weight control, and a small number of non-severe hypoglycaemias, compared to higher doses. Canagliflozin 300mg was the most costly strategy (£32,087, vs. £31,217 for canagliflozin 100mg, £31,409 for empagliflozin 10mg and £31,557 for empagliflozin 25mg). Therefore, empagliflozin 10mg dominated both canagliflozin 300mg and empagliflozin 25mg, and resulted in an incremental costeffectiveness ratio of £17,445 per QALY gained vs. canagliflozin 100mg. However, incremental QALY and cost differences were not significant based on 95% percentile confidence intervals. These results remained robust when sensitivity analyses were conducted, including utilities, adverse events, discontinuation, modelling of weight, impact of BMI, duration of effect, time horizon and discount rates. cOnclusiOns: Differences in QALYs and costs between SGLT2is as add-ons to MET+SU were minor. On average, empagliflozin 10mg resulted to be the most cost-effective option for T2DM patients failing MET+SU when commonly accepted thresholds in the UK were considered, with an incremental cost per QALY of £17,445 compared to canagliflozin 100mg.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.