In 1906, the preparation of “molybdic acid hydrate” was published by Arthur Rosenheim. Over the past 40 years, a multitude of isostructural compounds, which exist within a wide phase range of the system MoO3−NH3−H2O, have been published. The reported molecular formulas of “hexagonal molybdenum oxide” varied from MoO3 to MoO3·0.33NH3 to MoO3·nH2O (0.09 ≤ n ≤ 0.69) to MoO3·mNH3·nH2O (0.09 ≤ m ≤ 0.20; 0.18 ≤ n ≤ 0.60). Samples, prepared by the acidification route were investigated using thermal analysis coupled online to a mass spectrometer for evolved gas analysis, X-ray powder diffraction, Fourier transform infrared, Raman, magic-angle-spinning 1H- and 15N NMR spectroscopy, and incoherent inelastic neutron scattering. A comprehensive characterization of these samples will lead to a better understanding of their structure and physical properties as well as uncover the underlying relationship between the various compositions. The synthesized polymeric parent samples can be represented by the structural formula (NH4)(x∞)(3)[Mo(y square 1−y)O(3y)(OH)(x)(H2O)(m−n)]·nH2O with 0.10 ≤ x ≤ 0.14, 0.84 ≤ y ≤ 0.88, and m + n ≥ 3 − x − 3y. The X-ray study of a selected monocrystal confirmed the presence of the well-known 3D framework of edge- and corner-sharing MoO6 octahedra. The colorless monocrystal crystallizes in the hexagonal system with space group P6(3)/m, Z = 6, and unit cell parameters of a = 10.527(1) Å, c = 3.7245(7) Å, V = 357.44(8) Å3, and ρ = 3.73 g·cm(−3). The structure of the prepared monocrystal can best be described by the structural formula (NH4)(0.13∞)(3)[Mo(0.86 square 0.14)O2.58(OH)0.13(H2O)(0.29−n)]·nH2O, which is consistent with the existence of one vacancy (square) for six molybdenum sites. The sample MoO3·0.326NH3·0.343H2O, prepared by the ammoniation of a partially dehydrated MoO3·0.170NH3·0.153H2O with dry gaseous ammonia, accommodates NH3 in the hexagonal tunnels, in addition to [NH4]+ cations and H2O. The “chimie douce” reaction of MoO3·0.155NH3·0.440H2O with a 1:1 mixture of NO/NO2 at 100 °C resulted in the synthesis of MoO3·0.539H2O. This material is of great interest as a host of various molecules and cations.

MCM-41 and SBA-15 silicas were studied by (29)Si solid-state NMR and (15)N NMR in the presence of (15)N-pyridine with the aim to formulate generic structural parameters that may be used as a checklist for atomic-scale structural models of this class of ordered mesoporous materials. High-quality MCM-41 silica constitutes quasi-ideal arrays of uniform-size pores with thin pore walls, while SBA-15 silica has thicker pore walls with framework and surface defects. The numbers of silanol (Q(3)) and silicate (Q(4)) groups were found to be in the ratio of about 1:3 for MCM-41 and about 1:4 for our SBA-15 materials. Combined with the earlier finding that the density of surface silanol groups is about three per nm(2) in MCM-41 (Shenderovich, et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11924) this allows us to discriminate between different atomic-scale models of these materials. Neither tridymite nor edingtonite meet both of these requirements. On the basis of the hexagonal pore shape model, the experimental Q(3):Q(4) ratio yields a wall thickness of about 0.95 nm for MCM-41 silica, corresponding to the width of ca. four silica tetrahedra. The arrangement of Q(3) groups at the silica surfaces was analyzed using postsynthesis surface functionalization. It was found that the number of covalent bonds to the surface formed by the functional reagents is affected by the surface morphology. It is concluded that for high-quality MCM-41 silicas the distance between neighboring surface silanol groups is greater than 0.5 nm. As a result, di- and tripodical reagents like (CH(3))(2)Si(OH)(2) and CH(3)Si(OH)(3) can form only one covalent bond to the surface. The residual hydroxyl groups of surface-bonded functional reagents either remain free or interact with other reagent molecules. Accordingly, the number of surface silanol groups at a given MCM-41 or SBA-15 silica may not decrease but increase after treatment with CH(3)Si(OH)(3) reagent. On the other hand, nearly all surface silanol groups could be functionalized when HN(Si(CH(3))(3))(2) was used.

The hydrogen bond interaction of pyridine with sulfonic and phosphonic acid moieties at the surface of SBA-15 ordered mesoporous silica has been studied by a combination of solid-state NMR techniques. The composition of the materials is characterized by 29Si MAS NMR, the residual water content is inspected by 1H MAS NMR, and the hydrogen bond interactions are characterized by 15N CPMAS NMR at 130 K using pyridine-15 N as a probe molecule. It is shown that (i) all acid moieties at the surface are accessible for pyridine; (ii) each sulfonic acid moiety interacts with one pyridine molecule; (iii) each phosphonic acid moiety can interact simultaneously with two pyridine molecules; (iv) for both materials the interaction of the acid moieties with the base results in proton transfer to pyridine. The observed proton-donating ability of the acid moieties depends on the presence of residual water. In contrast to nonfunctionalized SBA-15, the sulfonic acid-functionalized SBA-15 material contains about six water molecules per acid moiety after drying at 420 K in high vacuum. From the 15N chemical shift of pyridine in the hydrogen-bonded complex, it is estimated that the proton-donating ability of the acidic functional groups solvated by such small water clusters is equivalent to that of acids in water exhibiting a pK a of about 0.6 and 1.3, respectively, for the sulfonic and phosphonic acid moieties. The O···H and H···N distances in the hydrogen bond of the pyridine complex are r OH ≈ 1.69 Å and r HN ≈ 1.05 Å for sulfonic acid, as compared to r OH ≈ 1.53 Å and r HN ≈ 1.09 Å for phosphonic acid.