Summary
Background
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with production of different serum non‐organ‐specific antibodies (NOSA) and risk for developing autoimmune disorders. The clinical significance of these phenomena is not fully understood.
Aim
To assess non‐organ‐specific antibodies before and 24 weeks after the end of therapy with direct‐acting antivirals in patients with HCV‐related infection, to better clarify the clinical relevance of these antibodies in terms of treatment response and prognostic value.
Methods
Patients enrolled (191) were considered non‐organ‐specific antibody‐positive for titres ≥1:40 on at least two determinations before treatment.
Results
At baseline, 46 patients were positive and 145 were negative for autoantibodies. The prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis was significantly higher in non‐organ‐specific antibody‐positive group than non‐organ‐specific antibody‐negative group (P = 0.02). HCV‐RNA 24 weeks after the end of antiviral therapy was 100% negative in patients with antibodies positivity and 98.6% in antibody‐negative patients (P = 1.0). In the former group, autoantibodies disappeared in 30 of 46 patients (65.2%). On multivariate analysis, non‐organ‐specific antibody‐negativity was significantly reduced in patients with hepatic hilar lymphadenopathy (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.02‐0.94, P = 0.04). None of the adverse events occurring during antiviral therapy was related to autoimmune disorders.
Conclusions
Hepatitis C virus clearance frequently reduces non‐organ‐specific antibody positivity suggesting that they represent an epiphenomenon of the viral infection. However, in patients who did not become negative, long‐term monitoring would establish whether they could hide an underlying process that may progress into a clear autoimmune or rheumatologic disease. (Trial registration number: NCT03566966).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.