Fifty-two patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with yttrium-90-labelled monoclonal antibody HMFG1 administered intraperitoneally following conventional surgery and chemotherapy as part of an extended phase I-II trial. The treatment was well tolerated and the only significant toxicity observed was reversible myelosuppression as previously described. Following conventional surgery and chemotherapy, 21 out of the 52 patients had no evidence of residual disease and were regarded as receiving treatment in an adjuvant setting. To date, two of these patients have died of their disease (follow-up 3-62 months, median follow-up 35 months). This extended phase I-II study suggests that patients with advanced ovarian cancer who achieve a complete remission following conventional therapy may benefit from further treatment with intraperitoneal radioactive monoclonal antibody.
From March 1987 to March 1988, a phase I to II study was carried out in 25 patients with ovarian cancer. They received escalating doses of intraperitoneally (IP) administered yttrium-90 (Y-90)-labeled monoclonal antibody, HMFG1, against a tumor cell-surface antigen. Myelosuppression prevented an escalation of the administered Y-90 activity above 25 mCi. Y-90-labeled antibody was absorbed from the peritoneal cavity into the circulation. Maximum blood Y-90 activity was observed 40 hours after the IP injection with a mean of 21% of the injected activity (range, 14.2% to 26.4%) in the circulation. The radiation dose the bone marrow received from circulating Y-90-labeled antibody (the blood radiation dose) was calculated by applying the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) formulation to the measured Y-90 activity in patients blood. Myelosuppression occurred following calculated blood radiation doses to bone marrow of only 10 to 30 cGy. The excessive myelosuppression following such modest radiation doses from circulating Y-90-labeled antibody could be explained by the uptake of Y-90 by bone. In an attempt to reduce bone absorption of Y-90, seven patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of EDTA (Sinclair Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Godalming, United Kingdom). This increased the urinary excretion of Y-90 from a mean of 11.1% to 32.3% of the injected activity (P = .0001). Fourteen patients had assessable tumor at laparoscopy. Tumor regression was observed in one patient, and palliation of ascites in a further patient.
Background. The intracavitary route for the administration of monoclonal antibodies is used in a variety of locally spreading cancers. The authors have been treating patients with ovarian cancer in Phase I and II studies assessing toxicity and response to improved radioimmunoconjugates.
Methods. Nineteen patients, 34–65 years of age, were treated with a new radioimmunoconjugate, 90Y‐CITC‐DTPA‐HMFG1, instilled in the peritoneal cavity after second‐look laparoscopy. Activity was increased in a step‐wise fashion.
Results. Following the intraperitoneal administration of 90Y‐CITC‐DTPA‐HMFG1, levels of the radioimmunoconjugate in the blood increased, reaching a peak of about 30% of injected activity at around 54 hours post‐treatment. Approximately 18% of the radiolabel was excreted in the urine within 96 hours. Bone‐marrow toxicity was the dose‐limiting factor. Grade III platelet and granulocyte toxicity was observed at 19.3 mCi/m2. A type III immunologic response was observed in a number of patients.
Conclusions. A dose of 18.5 mCi/m2 for subsequent treatments is recommended, based on a linear correlation of activity dose‐to‐body surface area. The clinical profile of a mild to moderate hypersensitivity syndrome is presented and hypotheses regarding its etiology are suggested. Cancer 1994; 73:1067–75.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.