Leptin produced by adipocytes controls body weight by restraining food intake and enhancing energy expenditure at the hypothalamic level. The diet-induced increase in fat mass is associated with the presence of elevated circulating leptin levels, suggesting the development of resistance to its anorectic effect. Rats, like humans, show different susceptibility to diet-induced obesity. The aim of the present study was to compare the degree of leptin resistance in obesity-prone (OP) vs obesity-resistant (OR) rats on a moderate high-fat (HF) diet and to establish if the effects of leptin on hypothalamo-pituitary endocrine functions were preserved. Starting from 6 weeks after birth, male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed on either a commercial HF diet (fat content: 20% of total calorie intake) or a standard pellet chow (CONT diet, fat content: 3%). After 12 weeks of diet, rats fed on HF diet were significantly heavier than rats fed on CONT diet. Animals fed on HF diet were ranked according to body weight; the two tails of the distribution were called OP and OR rats respectively. A polyethylene cannula was implanted into the right ventricle of rats 1 week before central leptin administration. After 12 weeks of HF feeding, both OR and OP rats were resistant to central leptin administration (10 OP, 80 [60; 98] as medians and 95% CIs of six rats for each group); the decrease of food intake following 200 µg leptin i.p. administration was similar in all the three groups (calorie intake as a percent of vehicle-treated rats: 86 [80; 92] as median and 95% CI). The long-term intake of HF diet caused hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia and higher plasma glucose levels in OP rats as compared with CONT rats. Plasma thyroxine (T4) was lower in all the rats fed the HF diet as compared with CONT. i.c.v. administration of leptin after 32 weeks of diet restored normal insulin levels in OP rats. Moreover, leptin increased plasma T4 concentration and strongly enhanced GH mRNA expression in the pituitary of OP as well as OR rats (180 10% vs vehicle-treated rats). In conclusion, long-term intake of HF diet induced a partial central resistance to the anorectic effect of leptin in both lean and fat animals; the neuroendocrine effects of leptin on T4 and GH were preserved.

We here report a pharmacological characterization of two new somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype-2 (sst2) selective antagonists by evaluating their GH-releasing activity when administered, by different routes, in anesthetized adult rats and in freely moving 10-d-old rats. Moreover, we describe the effect of these SS antagonists on the GH response to GHRH after short-term high-dose dexamethasone (DEX) treatment in young male rats. BIM-23454 and BIM-23627, given iv, were able to counteract the SS-induced inhibition of GH secretion occurring after urethane anesthesia in a dose-dependent manner. In DEX-treated animals, the GH response to GHRH was partially blunted (5-min peak values, 270 +/- 50 ng/ml in saline-treated vs. 160 +/- 10 ng/ml in DEX-treated, P < 0.05); however, the simultaneous administration of BIM-23627 (0.2 mg/kg, iv) restored higher amplitude GH pulse, leading to a significantly higher overall mean GH response (area under the curve, 4200 +/- 120 ng/ml/30 min vs. 2800 +/- 100 ng/ml/30 min after GHRH alone; P < 0.05). The SS antagonists showed a reduced GH-releasing effect when administered sc or ip, likely attributable to decreased bioavailability, as compared with the iv route. SS antagonist administration also increased plasma glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels. Based on prior reports that sst2 tonically suppresses glucagon secretion, the antagonist most likely increased glucagon secretion from the pancreatic alpha-cells, with resultant increases in plasma glucose and then insulin.

The aim of our work was to compare the degree of leptin resistance in diet-induced obesity-prone and resistant rats, both in terms of reduction of feeding and of endocrine effects on somatotroph and thyroid axes. We concluded that both groups of rats show a selective resistance to the anorectic effect of leptin while the pathways mediating the neuroendocrine effects of the peptide were preserved.In our paper we omitted to acknowledge the study previously published by Levin and Dunn-Meynell (2002), which showed that diet-induced obesity (DIO)-prone rats are less sensitive than diet-resistant animals to the leptin's suppressive effect on food intake as well as on