SUMMARYA total of 64 nine-week-old pigs were used in two experiments to study the influence on feed intake, growth and carcass quality of dietary restriction at various ages or live weights. Two diets of different energy content were given throughout each experiment, which was divided into four periods on either an age or weight basis. Feed was restricted or offered ad libitum during each of the first three periods, all pigs being fed ad libitum during the last period.Compensatory intake following a period of feed restriction occurred at most stages of growth but was most marked in the early stages. Compensation when it occurred took several weeks to develop fully and persisted for some time, often after an intervening period of ad libitum feeding. Increased gains resulted from increased intake although some of the early compensatory gains could not be fully explained by increased intake.There were few appreciable differences between the pigs on the highand those on the low-energy diets. However, in the early stages the latter did not show the same response in intake following restriction as did the former (but in experiment I the latter were considerably lighter).No effects on carcass quality were demonstrated under the conditions of these experiments.
Data from 1357 boars ad libitum fed on a performance testing scheme were analysed to explore the genetic aspects of voluntary food intake. The heritabilities of food intake, daily gain and food/ gain were found to be 0-23, 0-41 and 0-18 respectively. The correlations obtained between gain and intake of 0-63 (phenotypic) and 0-89 (genetic) were typical of those reported for ad libitum feeding but greater than those reported for semi-restricted. Estimates of genetic correlation between gain and efficiency ranged from 0-64 to zero and for the phenotypic correlation from 0-44 to zero and were smaller than those reported for restricted feeding. Correlations between intake and efficiency were highly negative on the phenotypic level but small and of variable size genetically, in contrast to reports of small phenotypic and positive genetic correlations under restriction.
SUMMARYForty Large White × Wessex pigs were fed from 7 to 27 kg live weight, on diets containing either 28 or 14% crude protein. From 27 to 113 kg live weight the pigs were fed a common diet ad libitum. Pigs from each treatment were killed at 27, 54, 82 and 113 kg live weight and the chemical composition was determined. From 7 to 27 kg and from 27 to 113 kg live weight, daily gain, food intake and food conversion efficiency were similar for the two treatments.At 27 kg, pigs on the lower protein diet were fatter and contained less lean tissue. Between 27 and 54 kg live weight the pigs previously on the higher protein diet deposited a much greater amount of fat than the pigs on the lower protein diet, so that by 54 kg the pigs initially on the lower protein contained less fat. At 82 and 113 kg live weight the pigs given the lower protein diet initially also tended to contain less fat. These findings are discussed with particular reference to the voluntary energy intake of growing pigs.
The urine of pigs contains a substance with an anorexigenic effect when injected into pigs or rats. When injected into rats or pigs on ad libitum feeding a urine extract caused a reduction in food intake only when the extract had been obtained from the urine of satiated pigs, and not from hungry pigs. The pig urinary anorexigen there-fore appears to be similar in nature to the anorexigen extracted from rat urine. Like rat urinary anorexigen, its anorexigenic effect is largely dose dependent and it is soluble in distilled water. Rats injected with plasma from satiated pigs showed an anorexigenic reaction but injection of plasma from hungry pigs had no effect on food intake. The possible role of these anorexigenic substances in the control of voluntary food intake in the pig is discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.